Skip to comments.
Amid scandals, Bush White House takes a risky path, placing loyalty over public duty.
Philadelphia Inquirer ^
| 7/17/2002
| Jonathan Turley
Posted on 07/17/2002 12:47:25 PM PDT by dirtboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 401-416 next last
To: dirtboy
Perhaps you would like to peruse the Freeper archives and read the articles Turley wrote condemning the Clinton Administration. And please elaborate on how this column is fictional... It is truly amazing how the worm turns. The Bush administration is up to its eyeballs in hypocrisy and their supporters are turning a blind eye(ball).
121
posted on
07/17/2002 2:38:41 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: FreedominJesusChrist
If the SEC finds Cheney and Halliburton in the claer, will Klayman drop his suit?
Most of us aren't claiming that Dick Cheney is outright guilty of the crimes alleged by Judicial Watch.
Do you disagree with Klayman that George Bush has said that Dick Cheney is above the law?
122
posted on
07/17/2002 2:38:49 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Demidog
Ditto on that one.
To: Registered
Do you feel my "warped spam(reply#110)" applies to you? Interesting. Uh yeah it does, you are trying to paint any Bush supporter as some hysterical female.
But you live in your own simplistic world, that's your choice.
124
posted on
07/17/2002 2:39:52 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Howlin
Dick Cheney is not above the law and should not be.
I do not know the answer to your question above, as I have no way of reading the mind of Larry Klayman.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Do you happen to have access to Halliburton's accounting booksAnd neither does Larry Klayman.
If not, perhaps you should be fair enough to acknowledge that even you do not absolutely know for sure if Cheney is guilty of the crimes alleged or not.
Perhaps you will ask Larry Klayman to do the same thing, eh? I think not. No PR in that for him.
126
posted on
07/17/2002 2:40:25 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Klayman will hopefully get the Discovery that he needs to prove his case in court.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
That's not what I asked you. Do you believe that George W. Bush said that Dick Cheney is immune from the law?
You do know, don't you, that Larry Klayman made that EXACT statement to Wolf Blizter. Do you agree with him?
128
posted on
07/17/2002 2:41:37 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: kitkat
I can't wait until Jonathon Turley of the Philly Inquirer writes his first ADMITTEDLY fictional book. He sure is good at twisting the facts and presenting a fictionalized version of the truth. Jonathon Turley does not work for the Inquirer. He's a constitutional law professor at George Washington Univ. Law School.
I generally tend to agree with Turley but he's way out of phase on this one. Perhaps he should have previously read the Wash. Compost editorial of last week or the LA Slimes article of Sunday. The Harken "case" has been exposed as a nothing.
Turley is generally reasonable and - unlike many "celebrities" - he answers e-mails.
To: Howlin
George W. certainly does seem to insinuate this belief.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
The word "discovery" is NOT capitalized.
131
posted on
07/17/2002 2:42:23 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Demidog; FreedominJesusChrist
It is truly amazing how the worm turns. The Bush administration is up to its eyeballs in hypocrisy and their supporters are turning a blind eye(ball). The only worm that is turned is the one that went down your throat after you finished the tequila bottle, especially after your rants saying that 9/11 was America's fault on 9/12.
BTW FIJC, before you get in bed with demi, he is pro-choice.
132
posted on
07/17/2002 2:42:49 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Hey, Rebeckie...I thought you got banned.
133
posted on
07/17/2002 2:42:59 PM PDT
by
Deb
To: Howlin
I can Capitalize it if I want to.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
George W. certainly does seem to insinuate this belief.Exactly WHERE does George W. Bush insinuate that Dick Cheney is above the law. The exact words, please.
135
posted on
07/17/2002 2:43:12 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Well, that's just one more thing you're wrong about then.
136
posted on
07/17/2002 2:43:38 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Dane
Hmm, leaving out "too early to tell" says a lot, IMHO. With those words you have a suspicion of guilt, which is fine, that's your opinion. Nice tactical retreat, Dane, but you still have a ways to go. Under your standards, police would be stymied from just about ANY investigation, lest they operate with a suspicion of guilt. I'm sure the SEC never investigates ANYONE with a suspicion of guilt /sarcasm.
137
posted on
07/17/2002 2:44:11 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Dane
I never ever stated that 9/11 was America's fault.
And I don't even know who Demidog is.
Furthermore, I don't get into bed with anyone, as I am not married.
To: Dane
Uh yeah it does, you are trying to paint any Bush supporter as some hysterical female.
Trust me, I'm not trying to paint just "any"....
BTW, maybe someday this simpleton will rise to your level of sophistication...
To: Howlin
By butting his nose into a situation which is none of his business right now.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 401-416 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson