Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy
Is it equivilant to the suffering of a human? No. Is it still callous indifference to suffering? Yes. That's what makes them sickl people for doing so for their own amusement.
28 posted on 07/16/2002 3:52:34 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Bogey78O
What animals "feel" is not what I would interpret as "suffering" in the human sense.

I admit this guy does have issues though. He may only be dangerous to his own pets, of course, but if this kitten belonged to someone else, he did cause suffering on the part of the animals owner and should suffer consequences.

I ran over a dog once and felt nothing for the dog. The owner was devastated, however. It was as if she had lost her husband. I did feel bad for her - I felt REALLY bad for her. I didn't do it on purpose, but I still felt bad. But ALL of my bad feelings were for the HUMAN owner, not the soulless walking meat.
33 posted on 07/16/2002 3:57:56 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Bogey78O
Is it equivilant to the suffering of a human? No.....

How the H... do you know? And find a dictionary, genius.

292 posted on 07/17/2002 2:04:49 AM PDT by ChasingFletch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson