[dsutah]

Ok, ok, maybe you're right and wrong about him. I certainly don't know him or the girlfriend. But why are you so willing to jump to his defense, and trashing her? Does she appear to be a feminazi? She doesn't fit the description of one. Not of the ones I've read about!

She seems to be a lady who may not have been particularly religious before when she met him, but when she had the child, she decided to go back to church, and became more conservative in her faith. Who knows what happened, that's my guess. I've known some women, and men to have done that.

Perhaps like you say, he is contributing to the care of the child, but how do you know? We can only take his word for it now. Don't you think maybe she is working too, and taking care of the child. But this is going to hurt her relationship (the child)with her dad, if he goes on antagonizing people. He may have a valid fight with the family courts, but why is he lying about the child being hurt, when she obviously isn't? Isn't that teaching her to hide behind people, and lie, and get what you want at the expense of other people?

I have a uneasy feeling that there is someone, or a group of people behind him, putting him up to do this. He may have money and means, but enough to live on, contribute to his child's upkeep, and go around from courtroom to courtroom antagonizing people?

One day he's liable to push someone too far, and they'll hurt him, or wind up in prison with his courtroom antics. How is he going to see his daughter grow up then? She's either going to grow up being afraid of him, or angry with him for ruining her childhood. He appears to be an angry, bitter man, always looking for a fight.

[glory]

She seems to be a lady who may not have been particularly religious before when she met him, but when she had the child, she decided to go back to church, and became more conservative in her faith. Who knows what happened, that's my guess. I've known some women, and men to have done that.
>>

Count me in. Fortunately, I didn't marry a nutjob though!

[flyervet]

Feminazis are women who think that men have no value beyond their financial contribution to their children. That is exactly what we seem to have here- a woman who has so little regard for her child's relationship to her father that she moves 3,000 miles away from him but is content to take nearly double his income in child support.

If the mother of Michael Newdow's child had legal standing to prevent him from being part of his daughter's life, don't you think she would have filed charges against him? Don't you think if she had anything beyond "Gee, he's just not an individual I particularly like," she would be putting on a performance for the media? Get real.

I suspect that if it weren't for the fact that Michael Newdow is an outspoken atheist you would be appluading his efforts to be a father to his daughter.