Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: apochromat
Don, just between you and me ... are you retarded?

Just between you and me have you ever maintained a civil tongue in your head for more than a few seconds in a row?

417 posted on 07/20/2002 12:53:15 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies ]


To: donh
Hey, you self-described improper cretin, if you are going to criticize me before I say a thing to you, then at least present a reason.

Sheeeesh, what a bunch a dingleberries.
418 posted on 07/20/2002 12:58:04 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

To: donh; Physicist; balrog666
You're just another guy like Physicist and balrog, acting the weasels and jerking me around. When are you guys going to see that your tales of reasonableness and politeness are getting way too threadbare? Go ahead, cover your offensive with your pretense of noble intent, then, as Judge Judy says, "Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining!"
419 posted on 07/20/2002 1:14:43 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

To: donh
I thought it was amusing that he presupposes an FTL "signal" and then wants Physicist to tell him how it would interact in the real universe. And the kicker was the signal itself was unspecified - shall we assume strange photons, tachyons, or perhaps some large clay tablets?

Of course, the online persona he has adopted for his posts is also good for a laugh. Once anyway.

420 posted on 07/20/2002 1:24:09 PM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

To: donh
Posted by OBAFGKM to apochromat
#155 of 432

"My understanding is FTL effects need not violate causality."

The problem comes with relativity. Suppose that an observer determines that event "A" is in some way the "cause"
of event "B." If FTL communication is possible, then relativity allows the existence of another observer who sees "B"
as occuring in "A's" past, i.e., as the effect having preceded the cause.

------------------------------------------

(don, I've no argument here with this poster, becuase he's not obnoxious and he's being helpful.)

------------------------------------------

Posted by Physicist to apochromat
#163 of 432

In a Wheeler-Feynman sort of way, I suppose.

No, in a Jack Finney-H.G. Wells sort of way. OBAFGKM already showed you that if Alice sends an FTL signal (event "A")
to an observer Bob (event "B"), and Bob is travelling towards Alice sufficiently fast, event "B" will occur before event "A"
in Bob's frame. That means that in Bob's frame, his line of simultaneity intersects Alice's location at an earlier time than she
sent it. So if Bob bounces this FTL signal back to Alice, it will arrive at her location before she actually sent it.

--------------------------------------

WTH?????? Blah! My leg is wet after that humper.

433 posted on 07/20/2002 3:22:47 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson