Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CIB-173RDABN
Either way, waiting for Saddam to do something (when that something could cause a large number of American casualities) is no longer an option.

So by that logic, we have to take out every regime that has the capacity of harming us. Good luck.

Saddam may or may not have had direct hand in WTC, but he is providing financing for terrorist groups.

I have not seen any reports or evidence that he's financing Al Qaeda. He finances homicide bombers in Israel, but that's Israel's problem, not ours. If you have any evidence that he's financing anti-American terrorists, I'd love to see it.

Not doing anything (other than warning him) will not stop terrorism against this country.

Whoever said it would? It would stop him from attacking us because he knows he would be history if he ever did it.

Taking out the source of finacial aid, and base for operations will.

If you think taking out Saddam is going to stop terrorism, I've got a bridge to sell you.

37 posted on 07/17/2002 7:41:29 AM PDT by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: traditionalist
By your logic we do nothing until they kill us all.

Sorry, but I am sure the truth is somewhere in between killing everyone that "may" harm us, and doing nothing until it is too late.

One reason we have a government is so they can make these types of descisions.

If you do not see the difference, then you do not want to see the difference.

39 posted on 07/17/2002 9:37:12 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson