Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: michellcraig
This is from today's Manchester Guardian reporting on a question period:

"Mr Blair was asked whether there was any evidence linking Saddam to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida organisation.

"He replied: 'There, as far as I am aware, is not evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the actual attack on the 11th of September.'

"Pressed on whether Saddam could be linked to the al-Qaida organisation, he said: 'There are various rough linkages there, but the issue is weapons of mass destruction, it is not what happened on the 11th of September or the al-Qaida terrorist network.'"

Richard Perle must have information that Tony Blair lacks.
10 posted on 07/16/2002 8:22:12 AM PDT by Seti 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Seti 1
Richard Perle has been junketing around the world declaring war against Iraq to be rightous and inevitable.The following is from http://www.dawn.com/2002/02/05/int2.htm

Attack on Iraq is unavoidable: US official's warning

MUNICH, Feb 4: A senior adviser to United States Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld indicated war with Iraq was likely even if Baghdad backs down and allows inspectors back in to hunt for weapons of mass destruction, according to an interview on Monday.

"I don't think there's anything (Iraqi leader) Saddam Hussein could do that would convince us there's no longer any danger coming from Iraq," said Richard Perle, head of the Defense Policy Board of the US Department of Defence and a top Rumsfeld adviser.

Perle, quoted in an interview with the German edition of the Financial Times at the Munich Security Conference, said the only thing that would convince the US regarding Iraq would be a change of regime.

US President George W. Bush was now on "a very clear path" heading toward war with Iraq, said Perle as quoted by the Financial Times Deutschland.

The newspaper said if Perle was right even Iraq's meeting the US demand for the return of international inspectors would do nothing to prevent American military strikes.

Perle said Afghanistan was a possible model for a war with Iraq. Such a scenario would include massive US air strikes on Iraq, special operations units on the ground and the use of domestic opposition groups to carry the main burden of ground war, said Perle.

"The potential fighting forces would be Kurds in the north and the Shias in the south," he said.

A leadership structure could be the Iraqi National Congress (INC), he added. The INC has long been regarded as weak and divided, the Financial Times Deutschland pointed out.

Perle repeated the view expressed by American officials at the conference that Washington was little concerned over European opposition to a war with Iraq. "If we have to choose between defending the US without our allies and not defending ourselves with our allies we will choose defence," said Perle.

"If the European message is: we accept risks posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and don't (want you) to do anything about it because it makes us nervous, then the European influence will be zero," Perle noted. He added: "Up until now the European recommendations have not been helpful."

The German foreign ministry on Monday warned against a military strike against Iraq by the United States. "There are no signs and no evidence that Iraq is involved in the terrorism that we have been discussing for several months," said Deputy Foreign Minister Ludger Volmer.

The fight against terrorism should not be used to legitimize old enmities and settle old accounts, said Volmer.

Both Volmer and Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer are members of the Greens party which serves as junior coalition partner to Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's Social Democrats.

Asked about Volmer's comments a foreign ministry spokeswoman, Sabine Sparwasser, said President Bush had assured at talks in Washington on Thursday that there were no plans to attack Iraq.

GERMANY: The German foreign ministry on Monday warned against a military strike against Iraq by the United States. "There are no signs and no evidence that Iraq is involved in the terrorism that we have been discussing for several months," said Ludger Volmer, Assistant Secretary at the Foreign Ministry, on a morning TV programme.

The fight against terrorism should not be used to legitimise old enmities and settle old accounts, said Volmer.

Both Volmer and Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer are members of the Greens party.-dpa

15 posted on 07/16/2002 9:47:17 AM PDT by Seti 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Seti 1
...Mr Blair was asked whether there was any evidence linking Saddam to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida organisation.

"He replied: 'There, as far as I am aware, is not evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the actual attack on the 11th of September...

Right. So....what's the war for?

Or does that question make your head hurt, Mr President?

27 posted on 07/16/2002 4:48:05 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Seti 1; Byron_the_Aussie
"Richard Perle must have information that Tony Blair lacks."

You know, it might not be information, but the willingness to talk about it. Why does the FBI and Mayor of LA say that the July 4th shooting at LAX was an isolated incident and not related to terrorism? They discredit themselves with this kind of nonsense.

The Czech government from the Prime Minister to their Intelligence Chief say that Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi Intelligence Al-Ani at the Prague Airport. They stand by that information, inspite of the CIA and US Gov trying to discredit it. I guess Al-Ani was just an old Atta family friend.

35 posted on 07/17/2002 7:28:19 AM PDT by Kermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson