It is not straight forward at all. My point was that just because blacks are commiting 85% of the interracial crimes you can not conclude from this fact that blacks are targeting whites. To conclude that blacks are targeting whites in significant numbers, you need another fact besides this one because the 85% figure is what you would expect from random crimes. Perhaps blacks are targeting whites, perhaps not. Perhaps whites are targeting blacks, perhaps not. My point is, that there is no statistically significant fact that says one way or another.
Please see my post 50 regarding cross racial rapes. While the fact that black on white crime was 85% of interracial crime might be explained by population statistics, its more a function of the large number of cross racial rapes committed by blacks (whites commit far more rapes).
Note that of black rapists, 41% of their crimes were cross racial, compared to 3% for white rapists. Thats far from statistically insignificant. If these were crimes of opportunity those stats would be similar for both groups.