Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Signed Stock 'Lockup' Letter
Associated Press ^

Posted on 07/15/2002 7:07:00 PM PDT by RCW2001

Bush Signed Stock 'Lockup' Letter
Mon Jul 15, 8:44 PM ET

By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Two and a half months before George W. Bush sold his stock in a struggling Texas energy company where he was a director, he signed a letter promising to hold onto the shares for at least six months, internal company documents show.

Photo
AP Photo

Related Quotes
HEC
0.42
+0.01

delayed 20 mins - disclaimer
Quote Data provided by Reuters

The "lockup" letter Bush signed on April 3, 1990, for his shares in Harken Energy Corp. is now being compared with the account his lawyers gave federal securities regulators who examined the stock sale as a possible insider trade.

Bush's lawyers have maintained for more than a decade that he had a pre-existing plan to sell his stock in Harken and other companies to pay a tax bill and a loan debt he owed for his stake in the Texas Rangers professional baseball team.

And they have said the sale wasn't motivated by Harken's deteriorating financial situation.

The letter Bush signed promising to hold onto the stock was released by the Securities and Exchange Commission ( news - web sites) under the Freedom of Information Act. At the time he signed it, Harken was considering a public stock offering to raise money to solve a cash flow problem.

"Dear George," said the April 2, 1990, letter from Harken secretary Larry Cummings. "As you are aware, Harken is contemplating a public common stock offering.

"In connection with such offering, the underwriters have requested that Harken obtain consents for all directors, officers and other affiliates to agree to not sell ... for a period of 180 days from the date our proposed public offering goes effective."

Bush signed and returned the letter the next day.

Bush's sale of his Harken stock for $848,560 has come in for renewed public scrutiny in recent weeks as he tries to restore investor confidence in the financial markets and calls for a crackdown on corporate wrongdoing.

White House spokesman Dan Bartlett said Monday the lockout letter was "made irrelevant and obsolete" by the time Bush sold his stock in summer 1990 because the public stock offering it affected never went through.

But a securities expert said the document calls into question his lawyers' account to the SEC.

"Bush's signing of the April 2, 1990, lockup agreement undercuts his lawyers' explanation for the early sale of his Harken stock," said Houston attorney Thomas R. Ajamie, an expert in securities law whose firm is advising companies that did business with the failed energy giant Enron.

"If his accountant told him that he needed to sell stock to pay a debt obligation for his interest in the Texas Rangers, it does not make sense that he would subsequently sign an agreement promising not to sell his shares of Harken stock for six months," Ajamie said. Harken scrapped the public stock offering a few weeks after Bush signed the letter because the company was plunged into a financial crisis when one of its bank lenders withdrew its support.

Bartlett said Bush and his accountant had discussions in late 1989 and early 1990 about the plan.

Bush's accountant, Robert McCleskey, said in an interview that Harken's deteriorating financial position was "not in my opinion" a factor in Bush's sale of the stock, adding that Bush "never said anything about it to me."

Bush had pledged 130,000 shares of Harken stock on the bank loan for the Texas Rangers, and when the bank note was renewed in early 1990, the shares were freed up, enabling Bush to sell them, McCleskey said.

"On the Rangers note, we were paying $45,000 to $50,000 a year in interest," said McCleskey.

Asked about the lockup document, McCleskey said a number of Bush's stock holdings from different companies were "on the table" and the sales would take place "when we get it done."

When the SEC examined the transaction more than a decade ago, Bush's lawyers offered a similar explanation as the one McCleskey gave Monday of why the future president unloaded stock at a time when Harken was experiencing financial difficulties.

"According to his attorneys, these sales, and the Harken sale, were made to meet an obligation of approximately $600,000 in connection with the Texas Rangers and to pay a couple hundred thousand dollar tax bill," an SEC memo from the probe states.

"According to his attorneys, Bush made these sales at the urging of his financial adviser/accountant who was bugging him to get liquid," the memo states.

The SEC did not interview Bush, so the only account of his sale came from what his attorneys told regulators.

One expert said even though Bush signed the lockup letter, it didn't represent a serious obstacle to selling.

It is fairly common for company insiders to sign such letters and then obtain permission to sell the stock anyway before the lockout period is up, said Carr Bettis, an associate research professor of finance at Arizona State University.

Bush sold his stock for $4 a share on June 22, two weeks after being approached by a California broker who said an institutional client wanted to buy a large block of Harken stock. The buyer has never been identified.

The stock's value declined to $3 two months later and to a little over a dollar a share by yearend. The following year, the stock rose to over $8 a share as Harken explored for oil in a potentially lucrative Middle East venture that never found any oil.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
GWB needs to dump ALL of the Harken facts on the table...and NOW! Otherwise, its going to be...drip, drip, drip!
1 posted on 07/15/2002 7:07:00 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
It's sorta like the Martha Stewart thing.
2 posted on 07/15/2002 7:14:38 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
>>>It is fairly common for company insiders to sign such letters and then obtain permission to sell the stock anyway before the lockout period is up, said Carr Bettis, an associate research professor of finance at Arizona State University<<<

So, what's the crime???? shheeesh.

3 posted on 07/15/2002 7:14:42 PM PDT by Tourist Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tourist Guy
Good point, but it appears to be moot in this case since the reason he was asked (and complied) to sign the letter( upcoming IPO) never happened. Whoever said he should lay the cards on the table is correct, however.

Only Democrats can get away with stonewalling in this country. In fact, the story the media spins is not why they're stonewalling, but how good they are at it. Disgusting, but that's the way it is.

4 posted on 07/15/2002 7:18:20 PM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tourist Guy
I don't believe there could be a crime, if there was a crime due to the statue of limitations. However, the daily 'new relevation' is going to take its toll and Bush should just dump ALL the facts...good or bad, right or wrong, right now.
5 posted on 07/15/2002 7:20:09 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Amelia; Deb; terilyn; deport; Mo1
Fodder for Larry?
6 posted on 07/15/2002 7:20:53 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
After the reason for the letter became moot, Bush was approached by a stock broker regarding a buyer he had for his stock. Since the underlying rationale for him to sell still obtained, AFTER checking with Harken's lawyers, and his lawyers, regarding insider information and Rule 144 issues, and after they gave him the OK to sell, he did. He then waived the attorney client privilege to facilitate the ensuing SEC investigation. This is all set for forth in this article. There really is no there there, and this hit piece doesn't change the compelling exculpatory nature of the underlying facts.
7 posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:06 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
However, the daily 'new relevation' is going to take its toll and Bush should just dump ALL the facts...good or bad, right or wrong, right now.

Despite what you might think, Bush is not a poodle named Fifi who has to jump through a hoop just because you or anybody else stomped their feet, demanding so.

8 posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:25 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Bush absolutely should not release anything. He should look at the bastards with blood in his eye and repeat that this had been investigated three times and three times nothing unlawful was found. Bush enjoys a 70% approval rating and releasing documents will not stop Dems and media Dems from the supposed "drip, drip, drip."

Fight like hell and remind everyone about Lieberman's ongoing coverup.

9 posted on 07/15/2002 7:25:31 PM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
However, the daily 'new relevation' is going to take its toll and Bush should just dump ALL the facts...good or bad, right or wrong, right now.

The "facts" are out; just go to the SEC website and you can read about Harken to your heart's content.

Whitewater proved that the American public could care less about complicated business deals. Whether Bush dumps all the data or not will not make one bit of difference.

10 posted on 07/15/2002 7:27:32 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Without a doubt.
11 posted on 07/15/2002 7:29:06 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I was starting to worry about you.
12 posted on 07/15/2002 7:29:12 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
 Fodder for larry.......
Yep here comes the FOIA.... tomorrow are the next day.....

Because no one is above the law
Even the 'eWW'  .. Let the Audits begin

13 posted on 07/15/2002 7:30:26 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Actually, now I know how the democrats felt with Whitewater. Because this is B O R I N G.

Most people do not care at all. To borrow a play from the democrat playbook: "This is old news and it's not easy for the average Joe to understand. And the President really, really, needs to get back to work for the American people."

14 posted on 07/15/2002 7:32:16 PM PDT by carmody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
There really is no there there, and this hit piece doesn't change the compelling exculpatory nature of the underlying facts.

Sounds as though that came right out of the "Clinton Playbook"...

15 posted on 07/15/2002 7:32:39 PM PDT by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Cute. Now grapple with the underlying facts. Granted, that might be a bit more work for you.
16 posted on 07/15/2002 7:34:35 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"There really is no there there, and this hit piece doesn't change the compelling exculpatory nature of the underlying facts."

The media, however, is not concerned with "underlying facts". Especially, if they are "exculpatory"...

17 posted on 07/15/2002 7:34:52 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Get serious.
18 posted on 07/15/2002 7:35:11 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001; Clara Lou
A poll I saw today said 61 percent of the people in this country aren't paying attention to this.

19 posted on 07/15/2002 7:36:09 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
From the Broker handling the sale.........

Smith said the trade came about because he called Bush on behalf of an "institution" that wanted to buy Harken Energy stock after other Harken directors said they did not want to sell. Bush also was a member of company's board.

At first, Smith said Bush told him "he didn't know if he could sell, and to check back."

"I checked with the [Harken] lawyers to make sure he could sell. ... They said that he could," he said. The former broker said it was "implicit" in later conversations that Bush also had sought legal advice.

Smith said he called again a couple of weeks later, and "then he said he would be interested in selling. [Bush] decided on the amount," and in June 1990 sold 212,140 shares for $835,807.

Before the deal went through, Smith said, Harken's lawyers wrote "a letter to the transfer agent ... [assuring him] there was no insider information available that wasn't available to the public. That's why he was allowed to sell."

Broker


20 posted on 07/15/2002 7:36:30 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson