Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book Seeks Answers to 1967 Israeli Attack On U.S. Spy Ship
Miami Herald ^ | July 14, 2002 | Elinor Brecher

Posted on 07/15/2002 11:44:28 AM PDT by gdani

Edited on 07/15/2002 11:55:59 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: meema
Will you forgive the CIA for putting the Liberty in a war zone after the US pulled out our Naval ships and said that we had none there?
41 posted on 07/15/2002 10:25:40 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The candid answer from the nation of Irsael would be: Don't snoop on us when a crucial war is going on. Don't put your spyship 13 miles offshore and if you do .....PLEASE move it when requested too.

The candid answer should have been from the United States: while you're on welfare, we'll do as we please, and to any real American, it's favorable to have Israel pushed into the sea than one American soldier dying (all strategic things being equal, of course).

42 posted on 07/15/2002 10:30:20 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The candid answer from the nation of Irsael would be: Don't snoop on us when a crucial war is going on. Don't put your spyship 13 miles offshore and if you do .....PLEASE move it when requested too.

And the candid answer from the U.S. Navy would be: Before you kill American sailors and try to sink American ships in international waters, you should first bend over and kiss your ass goodbye.

43 posted on 07/15/2002 10:40:03 PM PDT by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

 

A 'Fictual' take on the USS Liberty

 

 

 

The attack -

With Halsey and Nimitz in charge

2:00 PM

Three unmarked Mirages take out radios 1400 two Mirage aircraft 5 minutes (30mmcannon & 36 rockets)

 

 

Three jets approach. One flies 5 or 6 miles to starboard. Everyone expects it to settle into the now familiar reconnaissance pattern. As they watch a second plane dives in from port and fires rockets at the bridge. The attack on the United States has begun.

They attack again and again with rockets and 30 mm armor-piercing shells. Blood flows so thickly over the metal floor of the pilothouse that sailors trying to transverse the deck slip and fall into the blood. The dead, dying and wounded are scattered about.

                                                                                                              2:08 PM

Three unmarked Super-Mysteres attacked with napalm and dozens of rockets two 30mm gun

 

More planes come with rockets, cannon, and the dreaded napalm turning the Liberty into a floating hell. The Israelis hit everything they wanted to hit. and they had the right ordnance to do the job required:

-- heat seeking missiles to take out the tuning coils of every HF antenna

-- fragmentation bombs to take out the parabolic disks fore and aft

-- the first strafing run destroys all means of communications and all means of survival

-- the last attack is with napalm.

However, the crew was able to patch up it high-command radio-circuit antenna to send out flash messages but they discovered that all frequencies were being jammed. The jamming only stopped when the planes launched their rockets. Thus, the jamming came from the planes and could not be used while the rockets were airborne.

2:09 PM

The carrier USS Saratoga acknowledges Liberty's call for help.

2:12

Two unmarked Mirages with rockets - canons

                                                                                                               2:23

Saratoga 12 Phantoms are airborn - Full Afterburners

2:24 PM

 

The torpedo boats close in with their 20 mm and 40 mm machine guns blazing. Five torpedos launched

 

2:26

McNamara calls Adm Halsey and orders the Phantoms recalled

 

2:27  - Halsey tells the worm McNamara to ' Get f***'
2:35 PM

At first the torpedo boats fired 3'' shells into the engineering spaces in hopes of blowing up the boilers.

After their attacks the three torpedo boats reduced speed and began firing machine guns at the waterline with the purpose in mind to sink her. On the Liberty it looked like the ship would sink so three life rafts were lowered into the water. One of the Israeli boats shot up two of them and the third was brought aboard as a war trophy.

There were to be no survivors!

2:55 PM  -- Phantoms arrive
  • Three Jewish torpedo boats are hit with rockets
  • Tragically there were no survivors
3:05 PM

Two large Israeli troop-carrying helicopters that circled the ship with two commando units with their mission to kill all survivors.

3:06 PM
  • Two large jewish assualt helicopters and their crew are burning floating hulks
  • Sadly there were no survivors
3:10 PM

Air tankers arrive on station

3:12

The USS America 'Flying Eagles' squadron engage the Jewish Mirages

  • Sadly 4 Mirages and their crew were were lost

 

3:14 PM

The USS Saratoga's - 'Top hat squadron' engage the Jewish Mysteres

  • Sadly three Mysteres and their 'Gallant' crews were lost
3:25 PM

B-52's of the 7th airforce arrive over Israel

  • Every military installation is taken out
3:45 PM

Halsey on his flagship the Enterprise issues the following statement.

"I feel awful !"

3:52

Planes return to carriers


44 posted on 07/15/2002 11:07:36 PM PDT by jo6pac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
"Prepared by Alex Safian" writes:

"Again, there is a devastating flaw in Bamford’s logic – the “slaughter” never occurred. But even if it had, the reports Bamford cites offer no support. . .

Bamford’s fanatical animus towards Israel and its American – especially Jewish-American – supporters, which perhaps explains why he would publish such nonsense. There are also numerous apparently careless errors which further undermine Bamford’s believability . . . But the bottom line is that merely consulting old newspapers and old photographs is enough to demolish Bamford’s new conspiracy theories. Case closed."

I'm convinced. Never heard of Bamford before this evening but it is apparent from the reaction he got it right.

45 posted on 07/15/2002 11:11:33 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Because Bamford's work is attacked and shown to be factually incorrect by Jewish and pro-Israeli groups, it is wrong?
Once again your desire tyo see a Jewish conspiracy blinds you.
46 posted on 07/15/2002 11:17:27 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jo6pac
If Halsey or Nimitz were around, the CIA would not have put a lightly armed ship in harms way in contravention to the orders of the local Navy Brass.
47 posted on 07/15/2002 11:19:40 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gdani
The Japanese government took full responsibility for sinking the Panay but continued to maintain that the attack had been unintentional. The formal apology reached Washington on Christmas Eve. Although Japanese officials maintained that their pilots never saw any American flags on the Panay, a U.S. Navy court of inquiry determined that several U.S. flags were clearly visible on the vessel during the attacks. Four days before the apology reached Washington, the Japanese government admitted that the Japanese army strafed the Panay and its survivors after the navy airplanes had bombed it. The Japanese government paid an indemnity of $2,214,007.36 to the United States on April 22, 1938, officially settling the Panay incident

Sound familiar ?

See it can happen to anybody

On Dec 11 1937 The Japanese made the same error. Opps Sooo sorry

The above excerpt is from "Two Japans": Japanese Expressions of Sympathy and Regret in the Wake of the Panay Incident

For those who went to schools that teach about pink triangles but could care less if you know history.
On Dec 11 Th. 1937 the Japanese attacked and sank the Gunboat U.S.S. Panay in China on the Yangtze River.And clamed it was mistake.

The Sinking of Panay, 12 December 1937

PR-5 USS Panay

Isn’t it something how history repeats it’s self.

48 posted on 07/16/2002 12:35:04 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I know the rhetoric of fear of exposure when I see it.
49 posted on 07/16/2002 12:48:20 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
The candid answer should have been from the United States: while you're on welfare, we'll do as we please, and to any real American, it's favorable to have Israel pushed into the sea than one American soldier dying (all strategic things being equal, of course).


--->Only problem with your devoid_of_facts post is that Israel got minimum money from the USA in 1968. And that Isael helped the USA counter Russian influence in the Mid East back then. While the USA was involved in Vietnam.
50 posted on 07/16/2002 3:36:27 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
If You go to the USSLiberty website maintained by the survivors You will get to hear from people who were there.

They said the Israeli planes were flying over quite awhile before the attack.

They said the planes were so low that they could see and were waving at the pilots as they were sunning on the deck.

During the attack johnson ordered planes that were being sent to stop the attack to return to their ship.

johnson said he didn't want to embarrass his allies.

Maybe just like Ron Brown's airplane there was a threat aboard that needed to be silenced and like Ron Brown's plane the rest were "acceptable losses".

My old man was in the Navy for twenty years and I never saw an American ship that wasn't plainly marked or not flying the American flag.

Besides this was a radio ship and wasn't armed for battle , I'm sure this must be common knowledge to anyone who may be warring with us.

51 posted on 07/16/2002 4:41:25 AM PDT by Eustace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gdani
If anyone is really that interested in the truth of what really happened with the USS Liberty attack why not find out what our American brave survivors God Bless them)have to say at their website ??? ussliberty.org

For anyone like the above poster to now direct the attention to the USS Marine attack at Lebanon GIVE ME A BREAK !! There is a difference in an attack by our enemies and an attack by our alllies/friends !

Besides, I wish people would stop trying to avert the issue at hand by bringing up OTHER incidents, we are discussing this particular issue.

52 posted on 07/16/2002 4:41:44 AM PDT by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
You've revealed your bigotry and partisanship better than any link I could have come up with.
53 posted on 07/16/2002 6:24:59 AM PDT by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
You've revealed your bigotry and partisanship better than any link I could have come up with.

Yup, takes a bigot to disrespect Willis Carto all right. And to dismiss The Spotlight as a source.

Considering the "sources" like the Spotlight you seem to respect, I think not posting any more links would be a very good idea.

54 posted on 07/16/2002 6:46:16 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Get your facts right before you display your animus against Israel. In 1967, the Israelis were getting no aid from the U.S. Also, the Israeli were using French aircraft and British tanks, not U.S. equipment in 1967. But Israel was givng the U.S. the samples of all of the Russian arms, radar sytems, etc. it could snatch from the Arabs.
55 posted on 07/16/2002 7:07:42 AM PDT by NoLongerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rebelo3
If there had been a bunch of Egyptian soldiers slaughtered by the Israelis as Bamford claims, the Egyptians would have dug up the bodies and shown them to the world. They're not there. It never happened.
56 posted on 07/16/2002 7:10:53 AM PDT by NoLongerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Unfortunately for you, Loftus and Aarons wrote their book several years before the last election. Whether he was for or against Bush in the last election has nothing to do with what is in the book.
57 posted on 07/16/2002 7:14:01 AM PDT by NoLongerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: All
Instead of bickering on speculation, as I stated in an above post, why not read what our American survivors/heroes have to say of what really happened, and go to THEIR website, and may I add GOD BLESS THEM !

Ussliberty.org

58 posted on 07/16/2002 7:19:21 AM PDT by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: NoLongerLurker
Unfortunately for you, Loftus and Aarons wrote their book several years before the last election. Whether he was for or against Bush in the last election has nothing to do with what is in the book.

LOL!...right. Loftus is a man of principle. He doesn't have an ideology he's followed all his life. Bashing the Catholic Church, seeing Nazis everywhere in the Federal government, running a Holocaust museum, attempting to paint the Bush family as Nazi sympathizers, trying to spring Jonathon Pollard from prison by blaming Aldrich Ames for his crimes, making excuses for the murder of American sailors on board the USS Liberty...well...there is no connection between any of this.

Scotty...are you there Scotty? Give me the URL for Free Republic now...I've been transported to a...a...a negative Free Republic of some kind...led by a man named John Loftus who thinks he is in 1943 and Nazis still exist

59 posted on 07/16/2002 9:52:34 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
 

Bashing the Catholic Church, seeing Nazis everywhere in the Federal government, running a Holocaust museum, attempting to paint the Bush family as Nazi

Well now you are a double liar. I already posted to you how the US cracked down on a few Prescott Bush companies that were trading with the enemy (Nazis) during WW2. Stop lying. I don't like liars.
BTW> I like GWBush, voted for him, but am just pointing out the truth.

 

Bush Family Values
... While American soldiers were fighting the Nazis in WWII, three of Prescott Bush's
companies were seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act because they were ...
www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages

On October 20, 1942, the federal government seized the Union Banking Corporation in New York City as a front operation for the Nazis.  Prescott Bush was a director.  Bush, E. Roland Harriman, two Bush associates, and three Nazi executives owned the bank’s shares.  Eight days later, the Roosevelt administration seized two other corporations managed by Prescott Bush.  The Holland-American Trading Corporation and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation, both managed by the Bush-Harriman bank, were accused by the US federal government of being front organizations for Hitler’s Third Reich.  Again, on November 8, 1942, the federal government seized Nazi-controlled assets of Silesian-American Corporation, another Bush-Harriman company doing business with Hitler.   

60 posted on 07/16/2002 10:12:01 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson