Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
Now you wish to play children’s games. I have not heard one logical point of debate from you. You have not cited anything in statutory or legal citations to dispel any of my claims or support yours. Just your own interpretations based on opinion. I am very disappointed. I have more law posted here to support my claim than you have opinions.

Lastly.

Title 18 USC Section 4001(a). Limitation on detention; control of prisons. (a) No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress.

There is NO ACT OF CONGRESS that allows this. The Resolution is an open question and the Courts will decide this issue. If you are an Attorney I hope you don't prepared cases and arguments in this manner or you practice Real Estate Law. If your not then I completely understand. .

139 posted on 07/18/2002 5:22:07 PM PDT by habaes corpussel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: habaes corpussel
Now you claim that Public Law 107-40 isn't an act of congress.

So that makes what, the twelth time you've avoided defnding your claim that Americans are exempt from the resolution?

Are you trying to set a record for avoiding a point?


If someone else pings me to this thread, I'll come back.

142 posted on 07/18/2002 5:45:56 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson