Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: habaes corpussel
Yes, I have it on my hard drive already, did you intend to cite the congressional resolution instead?.

"show me where Congress provided for such legal authority on US Soil, one does not exist. A point you we seem to be stuck on.'

Did the congressional resolution "authorize the use of United States Armed Forces ..against those ... persons he determines..."
Yes it did.

Does the "use of use of United States Armed Forces" include captures and detentions?
Again, if you do not think so say why it doesn't.
I cannot think anyone would.

I believe this is the crux of our dispute on the Consitutionality of detentions.

114 posted on 07/16/2002 2:16:44 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
"Did the congressional resolution "authorize the use of United States Armed Forces ..against those ... persons he determines...Yes it did."

Not on US Soil.......

"Does the "use of use of United States Armed Forces" include captures and detentions?"

Ok, what does this have to do with the Padella case?

117 posted on 07/16/2002 2:25:34 PM PDT by habaes corpussel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson