"show me where Congress provided for such legal authority on US Soil, one does not exist. A point you we seem to be stuck on.'
Did the congressional resolution "authorize the use of United States Armed Forces ..against those ... persons he determines..."
Yes it did.
Does the "use of use of United States Armed Forces" include captures and detentions?
Again, if you do not think so say why it doesn't.
I cannot think anyone would.
I believe this is the crux of our dispute on the Consitutionality of detentions.
Not on US Soil.......
"Does the "use of use of United States Armed Forces" include captures and detentions?"
Ok, what does this have to do with the Padella case?