Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stingray51
If there are other advantages nobody is writing about them.

The airframe itself is stealthy, having the radar cross section of a large bird, and it is also less noisy for a helicopter. Combine it with a fire control radar and fire and forget radar equipped hellfire missiles and you have a platform that can fight quietly and is hard to detect at standoff ranges. It's real contribution though, is it's capability to send digital, real time information to commanders on the ground, airborne C3I platforms, and ostensibly control and view imagry from UAVs. It's being sold as the "quarterback for the Army's Objective Force". If it wasn't for that, it would probably already be dead as a program IMO. The AH-64D Longbow has some of the same packaging and continues to be upgraded but lacks the stealthy radar evading profile of the Comanche.

12 posted on 07/15/2002 7:36:45 AM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: TADSLOS
Okay, I understand the stealth capability but I'm just not sure it is worth the cost for an aircraft that, by definition, will usually fly where it can be seen by the naked eye.
14 posted on 07/15/2002 8:31:44 AM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson