To: kcvl
I saw the interview last night. She has sole legal custody, they were never married, and the kid is a Christian. Does he really have legal standing for filing the suit?
17 posted on
07/15/2002 4:40:46 AM PDT by
the crow
To: the crow
I have NO idea that's why I'm asking. All I seem to be getting is an attitude from some. I would really like to know the answer. Anyone care to give us a real answer?
19 posted on
07/15/2002 4:45:05 AM PDT by
kcvl
To: the crow
I saw the interview last night. She has sole legal custody, they were never married, and the kid is a Christian. Does he really have legal standing for filing the suit?
It appears that didn't make a difference to the court
22 posted on
07/15/2002 4:48:25 AM PDT by
rkrtgw
To: the crow
This guy is a stalker, and he is using the courts as a weapon. Notice that he first filed suit in Florida, where it was thtown out. The mother moved to California, and he apparently followed her. He does not live in the school district, and now we find out he doesn't have custody. I am wondering if he even gets visitation...or were all those toys a sham as well.
He is using the court to harass the mother. He should be arrested.
To: the crow
27 posted on
07/15/2002 4:53:32 AM PDT by
the crow
To: the crow
She has sole custody? I thought so, but at another forum people were saying that coulnd't be since he found standing in the court.....that they had to have shared custody.
To: the crow
Does he really have legal standing for filing the suit? A better question: Was the suit filed fraudulently?
206 posted on
07/17/2002 4:18:15 AM PDT by
bimbo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson