Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Newdow is NOT an athiest...
FOX NEWS (Fox & Friends per Fox News Rita Cosby) | 07/15/02 | Me

Posted on 07/15/2002 4:22:41 AM PDT by kcvl

Newdow is NOT an athiest. He is a PRACTICING Jew according to his child's mother per ED on Fox & Friends according to Rita Cosby's report interviewing Newdow's daughter's mother(they have never been married). He has always been "interested" in contitutional law is the reason given for taking this to court. Isn't THAT SPECIAL?!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: athiest; michaelnewdow; pledgeofallegiance; practicingjew; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-214 next last
To: zip
How do we spell PERJURY??????

How about 20 years behind bars?

141 posted on 07/15/2002 3:15:57 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
Way to skip the offensive sentence just above that. It is typical of his defense: I like jews, I have jewish friends, some jews are good and have done good things - And becuase I said that, I must not prejudiced when I say, ". . . responsible for the destruction of the fiber of this country? Well, it's not the Arabs. It's "The Chosen People".

He could not have been more clear as to what he is saying. Then go look at his posts and his disdain for Jews calling themselves "The Chosen" people and how that moniker somehow makes them targets.

142 posted on 07/15/2002 3:16:15 PM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
One queston....if you are BORN Jewish, but believe in NO God (atheist), are you still Jewish?
________________________________________

Yup. And the minimum for being born Jewish is your mother is Jewish.
143 posted on 07/15/2002 3:19:09 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: the crow
She has sole custody? I thought so, but at another forum people were saying that coulnd't be since he found standing in the court.....that they had to have shared custody.
144 posted on 07/15/2002 3:34:09 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
He could not have been more clear as to what he is saying. Then go look at his posts and his disdain for Jews calling themselves "The Chosen" people and how that moniker somehow makes them targets.

The "Chosen People" Theory

Knowledge of Jewish "choseness" is undeniably widespread. Several years ago, the University of California conducted a study of anti-Semitism. Non-Jewish Americans were presented with eighteen unfavorable statements about Jews, and asked whether they believed any of them. Fifty-nine per cent responded that they believed the Jews consider themselves to be G-d’s chosen people. This was by far the most widely-held belief among those surveyed.

In order to test whether this belief is indeed a legitimate cause of anti-Semitism – or whether it is merely another excuse – let us see what happens when Jews drop the claim that they are chosen. If Jewish "choseness" is in fact the cause of anti-Semitism, then hatred against the Jews should disappear. However, if Jewish "choseness" is just an excuse for anti-Semitism, then we should detect no improvement.

For our test case we need to find an era in history when Jews collectively rejected their "choseness" and were assimilated by their host nation. The choice is obvious – Germany at the turn of the century.

Germany -- the Jewish Motherland

Late in the nineteenth century, the Jews living in Germany and Austria denied that they were in any way "chosen." In fact, they believed that the non-Jews among whom they lived were the true chosen people. "Berlin is our Jerusalem!" they loudly proclaimed. Gentile society was their social environment of choice, and Germany was their beloved motherland.

Did anti-Semitism disappear? Well, we all know the answer to that question.

Following their espousal of their host nation’s culture, German and Austrian Jews experienced the most vicious outpouring of anti-Jewish hatred in recent history. Precisely when and where Jews rejected their claim to "chosenness," they suffered the most virulent forms of anti-Semitism.

Clearly, the "Chosen People" Theory does not pass this litmus test. Let’s see how it responds to others.

Click here for more analysis of "Why The Jews?"

145 posted on 07/15/2002 3:39:06 PM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ChasingFletch
Congratulations, you sidestepped my entire post!

I do agree with you about the state of music these days - flipping around the channels earlier netted me a minute of a recent Britney Spears video where she writhed around with a bunch of dancers, simulating orgy. And at the same time, Nickelodeon promotes this crap to 5 year olds.

And of course you know that "quote" is a decades-used antisemitic rule of thumb! The location and particulars change but the theme remains the same. No doubt one could find something quite similar in Mein Kampf. By the way, when you come up with something that somehow suggests that the Jews are even remotely responsible for the degradation of society, please be sure to flag me. I'm sure there are a few escaped Nazis in Buenos Aires that would be interested in your take on it too. They'd probably dust of their copies of Protocols just for you!

146 posted on 07/15/2002 3:39:24 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ChasingFletch
1. If Mr. Newdow is an atheist, he is not a Jew.
2. Even if he occasionally practices, by calling himself an atheist, he has broken from the Jewish community.
3. Stop proving that bigots are people of low intelligence. All religious groups consider themselves chosen. Ever heard of the "elect" in Christianity?
Perhaps you missed this statement in the New Testament "There is no way to heaven but through me?"
147 posted on 07/15/2002 3:43:09 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: prophetic
How about 20 years behind bars?

Works for me.

148 posted on 07/15/2002 3:57:17 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Question for you, dennisw - is the "mother must be Jewish" a talmudic requirement? Because basic biology tells me that if either parent is something, the child is half that something. Why is it then limited to the maternal line?

For biblical example - Ruth was not Jewish, she was a Gentile. She married a Jew, Boaz (he was from the family of Elimelech, of the tribe of Judah), and their son Obed was considered of the tribe of Judah, was he not? He had to have been, because he was David's grandfather.

Thoughts?

149 posted on 07/15/2002 3:57:25 PM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Because basic biology tells me that if either parent is something, the child is half that something. Why is it then limited to the maternal line?

I think this on is based on logic. One can conclusively say who the mother of a child is, but not the father. The mother is always at the birth. Before DNA and paternity testing, the only unquestioned lineage to rely on was the mothers.

150 posted on 07/15/2002 4:04:37 PM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: agrace
Ruth the Moabite converted. Re-read the story.
Tribal identity (LEvite, Benjaminite, etc) goes through the father.
151 posted on 07/15/2002 4:11:55 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: scholar
I've been thinking maybe it's time all of us on Free Republic file a class action suit against the democratic party for psychological damage to our children and ourselves from forcing us to live through 8 years of Clinton, massive tax increases, our rights stripped and the general damage conservatives are faced with by liberals/democrats who continue to equate us with racists/nazi's etc.

Now, I guarantee you we could show much more damage then the father of the child you mention could show - yet our suit would be considered, as Bill O'Reilly says, ridiculous. Unfortunately with liberals basically running most of our court system, ridiculous cases hold much merit - hmmmmm maybe we do have a chance? LOL
152 posted on 07/15/2002 4:16:04 PM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
I can see it now - the new religiously conscious pledge that will not offend anyone.

.....one nation, under God, Satan, Allah, Diana, Osiris (has to be some ancient Egyptians around somewhere), Kali, Shiva, the Great Mother Earth, etc etc etc.

When was an amendmented added to the bill of rights giving people in this country the right NEVER to be offended?
153 posted on 07/15/2002 4:19:14 PM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird14
LOL, I hope this Clymer Jewish doctor is terrified to show his face in public anymore.

hahahah yea right, people like this guy have absolutely no shame - no concern for the rights of others, they could care less as long as they get exactly what they want - even if it means using a child and commiting perjury to do it. Man, sounds like our former Plunderer and Chief doesn't it?

154 posted on 07/15/2002 4:22:17 PM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: kcvl; 2sheep; Thinkin' Gal; Alouette
I watched that interview. He's not a practicing Jew. She said his parents are atheists. Newdow is an atheist who doesn't believe in G-d but that he and the daughter have celebrated Passover and Chanukah. He's your average BIG HYPOCRITE!!!
155 posted on 07/15/2002 5:19:29 PM PDT by Prodigal Daughter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChasingFletch
Hey Felcher,
Congratulations! You are reason #25455 for FMCDH.
156 posted on 07/15/2002 5:32:04 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
I think the jerk gene stayed with the father.
157 posted on 07/15/2002 5:43:08 PM PDT by Thebaddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: agrace
"Protocols "

I have seen those protocols.

As far as I am concerned they are interesting. All I know is that Barry Bonds has a slugging pct., a great on base pct,. and he thinks there is a reason to believe that some organizations in this Republic are wanting!! He is unable to speak on these matters, but, he really dislikes the sport's reporters!

158 posted on 07/15/2002 6:29:30 PM PDT by ChasingFletch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Congratulations! You are reason #25455 for FMCDH.'......

WHATEVER THAT MEANS, YOU ARE EVEN.......... A BETTER REASON!.....

You are a freeper! Be well.......

159 posted on 07/15/2002 6:44:45 PM PDT by ChasingFletch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Congratulations! You are reason #25455 for FMCDH.'......

WHATEVER THAT MEANS, YOU ARE EVEN.......... A BETTER REASON!.....

You are a freeper! Be well.......

160 posted on 07/15/2002 6:44:47 PM PDT by ChasingFletch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson