Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E Rocc
But it's also true that most of those didn't believe in mixing government and religion, for both philosophical and practical reasons.

This is false. Every one of them ratified the DOI acknowledging that rights are granted by the Creator, not the state. It is the keystone of which this nation is founded upon. While this is not endorsement of a state established religion, which nobody here supports, it is an endorsement of God and the basis of the Constitution.

142 posted on 07/15/2002 10:27:53 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
But it's also true that most of those didn't believe in mixing government and religion, for both philosophical and practical reasons.

This is false. Every one of them ratified the DOI acknowledging that rights are granted by the Creator, not the state. It is the keystone of which this nation is founded upon. While this is not endorsement of a state established religion, which nobody here supports, it is an endorsement of God and the basis of the Constitution.

The Declaration represents the whys of the Revolution, not the hows of the new government. Indeed, between the time that the Declaration was adopted and the Constitution was written, we adopted and scrapped a separate founding document.

Nowhere in the Constitution is the Declaration given any weight as a legal basis of our government. If it was, us WoD opponents might be able to use the "pursuit of happiness" clause in court.

-Eric

147 posted on 07/15/2002 10:39:20 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson