Replies

I'm still waiting for the defense to show that dw didn't kill her..

Perhaps I'm confused here, but isn't the prosecution supposed to show that DW did kill her? The defense doesn't have to prove squat. It is the state that has the "burden of proof" as to guilt, and right now it's looking like a mighty heavy load for them to carry.

"The defense doesn't have to prove squat."

Yeah but if they can prove something to help the accused they tend to do it. It can really help things.

That was poor wording. It depends on how long I've been glued to my monitor on how poor it can actually get. I'll attempt to reword it..

I am still waiting for the defense to actually show that it has enough information to deflect any rays of guilt from dw to someone else. IE the defense could bring forth evidence from other neighbors houses or vehicles..such as danielle's blood drops or her hair or layla's hairs using tapelifts.. I mean if danielle had a habit of sneaking in other people's vehicles dripping blood we deserve to know that. (not neighbors she was at all the time of course..)