[John Jamieson]

Surely you don't believe we acheve ZERO. My question was how tight "reasonable doubt" should be interpreted, to acheve the desired result. If 0 is the goal, we could convict no one.

Don't get mad at me for asking a logical but tough question. If you want zero wrong convictions, you surely would have to let DW go, because even you must have a sliver of doubt.

[Freedom2specul8]

I can't answer that..it's a logical yet EMOTIONAL question. Just like the death penalty.