[Rheo]

Doesn't the prosecution have to go before the judge and ask to reopen their case before they are allowed a witness that has not already testified?....and they have to have a really darn good reason for doing so?

[cyncooper]

I believe I recall from the OJ trial in particular, which was in CA, that the prosecution's rebuttal case included witnesses who had not yet testified. Their purpose was to rebut points made by defense, so is not re-opening their case. Any lawyers can confirm?

[hoosiermama]

Yes I believe you are correct. It has to be a REALLY DARN GOOD REASON!!!!!!! ( At least here in Indiana, that the case.)