[Karson]

Apparently we aren't the only ones who have questions. One of the jurors sent a note to Judge Mudd asking when the jury would be able to question the witnesses. That tells me, things aren't 'adding up' for them either.

[Freedom2specul8]

I was shocked to hear that some states allow that. Missouri and kansas doesn't allow that unless the rules have changed within the past 4-5 yrs.

[the Deejay]

I imagine the jurors want the SAME questions answered that most of us do, too. The prosecution hasn't proven what they said they'd prove and it's very disturbing indeed.

[pyx]

One of the jurors sent a note to Judge Mudd asking when the jury would be able to question the witnesses. That tells me, things aren't 'adding up' for them either.

When was this note sent to Judge Mudd ?
I agree with you. It seems to indicate that at least some of what has been presented thus far is a source of confusion or is in serious doubt and therefore your conclusion about things not adding up, sees apt.

[cyncooper]

Didn't they send the note during the defense case? It COULD be they had a few questions about the defense. Of course, they may have questions for just the prosecution or both.

I knew grand juries could ask questions and was surprised when some FReepers said several states do allow the jury to question witnesses at trial. Very interesting revelation. I kind of like the idea if, for example (and I don't know how it is done in "real life") the question goes to the judge and both sides "approve" it.