Your right about one thing....we should string up every child/rapist/murderer.....send them immediately to h*ll.
Westerfield is no innocent.....her blood was found on him... and in his motorhome, that alone would do it for me.... no reason for that girls blood to be on him ...that along with all the other evidence and CHILD porn leads me to believe he was up to no good with that little girl and she is now dead. What other conclusion / explanation could there be?
Many here don't like the VDams and defend this perv in their holier than thou smugness in wanting to see immoral people (VD's) get their dues.
SoI guess I will head back to mulletville North/SouthCarolina where we don't cotton to perverts who rape and kill our babies.
Your right about one thing. 1:) It's "you're," not "your."
Westerfield is no innocent.....her blood was found on him... and in his motorhome, that alone would do it for me....
2.) I never said Westerfield was an "innocent." Regarding your reply, no one ever claimed blood was found "on him." A few drops -- a precious few at that -- were found on the jacket (see my earlier post about that) and in the motor home (see earlier post). The "CHILD porn" is definitely questionable as to who downloaded and who viewed; in fact, I find it INCONCEIVABLE the defense did not point out that it is entirely possible to dowload MULTIPLE binary files (and I mean hundreds if not thousands) via USENET to a folder and never view them...i.e., you would have no idea what they contain from the file name. To put it bluntly, fat Dave could have marked a thousand binary files to download from a USENET newsgroup, gone to bed as they downloaded, and then never looked at the plethora of pulchritude(sp?) he had on his "hard drive."
What other conclusion / explanation could there be?
3) There are a multitude of conclusions/explanations, many of which are more viable than an extremely drunk fat guy disabling an alarm system, wandering in a house without alerting a Weimariner, abducting a child, AND LEAVING NO EVIDENCE OF HIS PRESENCE.
Many here don't like the VDam
4.) I have no opinions about the van Dams. I do, however, understand the concept of "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." You, sir, do not seem to grasp that concept.
SoI guess I will head back to mulletville North/SouthCarolina where we don't cotton to perverts who rape and kill our babies.
5.) To my knowledge, there are no cities /states that "cotton" to "perverts" raping and killing their babies, and my remark about South Carolina was admittedly out of place (I live in NC, BTW). But I think even you would agree we need to PROVE someone guilty of a crime before we KILL them. Or at at least I hope that's what you think.
In the spirit of debate... Stiv