Skip to comments.
Judge Allows Danielle's Dad Back In Court: (Damon was banned for MAD-DOGGING Westerfield!)
North County Times-San Diego ^
| July 13, 2002
| Kimberly Epler
Posted on 07/13/2002 6:28:25 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 701-707 next last
To: KLT
"what he did to Danielle"
Darn, I must have missed the end of the trial! He's already convicted! The 12 have spoken, and I missed it all!
Was he guilty of the Porno Too???
To: KLT
Very true...DAMON is in a SWINGING STATE OF MIND...
To: pyx
Good lord I only hope the jurors can retain better than you folks.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Press articles won't cut it Kim. Where's the evidence of scientific testing to prove it is blood? THAT was my question, I already knew everyone was calling it blood.
To: KLT
"the
B@ST@RD never would have made it to court..."
Uuhh, s'cuse me. You're an advocate for vigilante justice? Last time I checked every person accused in this country has the right to defend themselves, face their accusers & have the RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL.
To: John Jamieson
Was he guilty of the Porno Too Well, I suppose it could of been planted.... /damn those VDams they thought of everything.
To: John Jamieson
I was trying to take the short cut route... hangon brotha
To: SouthernFreebird
I'm usually very tolerant of other points of view, and try to aurgue logically, but YOU are really starting to PO me. I think you ought to take your insults somewhere else. We were doing fine without them.
NOW, GO BACK IN YOUR HOLE.
DEFENESTRATE YOURSELF!
To: John Jamieson
You were doing fine praising a pervert and condemning the parents of a murdered child.......don't try to bully me with your arrogance.
If you can't handle an opposing POV then a forum is not for you.
To: SouthernFreebird
Did you make a wrong turn when you found this website?? I sure don't think you realize this is a CONSERVATIVE website.
So far, I haven't seen you post anything close to CONSERATISM.
To: FresnoDA
Very true...DAMON is in a SWINGING STATE OF MIND... Fres, if you do a John Anderson parody --I swear I'll mash "abuse" on every one of Kimmies posts !
To: KLT
...but his daughter was murdered in a most disgusting and dispicable manner
Actually, we don't know exactly in what manner Danielle Van Dam was murdered. In fact, according to the Medical Examiner and autopsy, its not even been determined that HOW Danielle died or if she was actually murdered.
Just because I and perhaps you, personally PRESUME Danielle was murdered, there is no factual evidence that she was as far as I can recall from testimony by the Medical Examiner. The manner of Danielle Van Dam's tragic death is still as yet unknown. I had hoped when this trial started and by now, her parents and the public would know the answers to these questions.
The prosecution promised a great deal in his opening statement. He has yet to deliver and considering the prosecution has RESTED, I don't see how the prosecution can deliver answers on what it promissed in its opening statements.
312
posted on
07/13/2002 8:14:25 PM PDT
by
pyx
To: the Deejay
CONSERATISM = CONSERVATISM
To: SouthernFreebird
I can easily handle another opposing point of view. It's you refusal to look at all the evidence (and the giant holes in it) along with your stated lynch mob mentality that bother me.
To: the Deejay
Oh pluze......show me one conservative who accepts a child-killing,child porno, bestiality killer or his apologist.
To: John Jamieson
"lynch mob mentality that bother me."
Yeah, me too. KLT, also, has that "lynch mob mentality."
To: SouthernFreebird
Looks like you're the new comer to FR, not me.
To: John Jamieson
Will this suffice for ya? :)
http://video.uniontrib.com/news/metro/danielle/transcripts/020624_pm1.html
Q MISS PEER, I BELIEVE WE HAD LEFT OFF WITH YOU HAD DESCRIBED SOME POPULATION STATISTICS ABOUT THE COMPARISON YOU MADE BETWEEN MR. WESTERFIELD'S KNOWN SAMPLE AND THE BLOOD ON THE JACKET LAPEL. DO YOU RECALL THAT?
A YES.
SNIP Q A BILLION IS -- SIX OR SEVEN BILLION IS MORE COMMON THAN THE NUMBERS THAT YOU'VE WRITTEN ON THE CHART WITH REGARD TO THE CARPET STAIN AND THE SHOULDER STAIN, IS THAT CORRECT?A THAT'S CORRECT.
Q NOW, I'M SORRY, I SPOKE TOO SOON ABOUT THE CHART. BUT PERHAPS YOU CAN DO IT WITH A POINTER.WE SEE THAT WITH THE CARPET STAIN AND THE SHOULDER STAIN THAT THE ESTIMATED RARITY OF THOSE PROFILES ARE DIFFERENT FROM ONE ANOTHER. IS THAT CORRECT?
A YES, THEY ARE.
Q THOUGH THEY'RE BOTH CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERPANTS AND LATER TESTING THAT YOU DID OF DANIELLE VAN DAM'S RIB SAMPLE, IS THAT RIGHT?A THAT'S CORRECT.
SNIP
A THEY'RE DIFFERENT BECAUSE ONE OF THE MARKERS IN THE BLOODSTAIN FROM THE CARPET DID NOT SHOW ANY D.N.A. TYPES. WHEN THE STATISTICAL CALCULATION IS MADE, IT'S MADE ONLY WITH THE NUMBERS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED TO THE MARKERS IN THE EVIDENCE SAMPLE, NOT TO THE REFERENCE, BUT IN THE EVIDENCE SAMPLE. THEREFORE, WHEN A STATISTICAL CALCULATION WAS MADE OF THE CARPET STAINS, IT ONLY TOOK INTO ACCOUNT THE TWELVE MARKERS THAT ARE THERE. AND WITH THE BLOODSTAIN FROM THE JACKET, IT TOOK INTO ACCOUNT ALL THIRTEEN MARKERS THAT ARE PRESENT.
To: SouthernFreebird
Me thinks you're just a punk.
To: SouthernFreebird
Oh pluze......show me one conservative who accepts a child-killing,child porno, bestiality killer or his apologist. Proof, proof, huh ?
The he dies, but not until.
The old North State has gone to shi+ if you're any example.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 701-707 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson