To: Shermy
-Six of the seven don't appear to have terrorist ties... -Three of the group are believed to have lived with the Sept. 11 hijackers.
Huh??
4 posted on
07/12/2002 10:07:00 PM PDT by
bluefish
To: bluefish; Grampa Dave
"Huh??"
And the guy at the LA airport wasn't a terrorist, ya know.
7 posted on
07/12/2002 10:10:02 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: bluefish
"-Six of the seven don't appear to have terrorist ties..."
"-Three of the group are believed to have lived with the Sept. 11 hijackers."
"Huh??"
My thought exactly!! What kind of idiots are we trusting our lives to???? Talk about giving the enemy free reign!!
To: bluefish
-Six of the seven don't appear to have terrorist ties...-Three of the group are believed to have lived with the Sept. 11 hijackers.
Huh??
Mega-HUH?
11 posted on
07/12/2002 10:13:19 PM PDT by
gcruse
To: bluefish
The seven are part of a larger group of foreigners from Jordan, Pakistan, Syria and Bangladesh suspected to have paid at least $10,000 each to an employee at the U.S. Embassy in Qatar between April 2000 and July 2001. Authorities said in exchange they received six-month visas without security screening or U.S. government authorization. Three of the[larger] group are believed to have lived with the Sept. 11 hijackers.
GET IT?
To: bluefish
Hey, easy with the tough math.
This reporter probably flunked new math while in school.
Only a mean conservative would want someone to do tough math like this and get it right:
-Six of the seven don't appear to have terrorist ties...
-Three of the group are believed to have lived with the Sept. 11 hijackers.
Or this PC/Diversity reporter was trained by the LA Slimes/NY Slime/Reuters where there are never any terrorists or terrorism by individuals or countries. Therefore, they would not have any connections with terrorism even if they live the noble hijackers.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson