To: spycatcher
This may come back to bite Bush in the *ss.
To: KansasGirl
This may come back to bite Bush in the *ss. Just like the LAX terrorist shooter and his adjustment of status from illegal to legal under 245i (AMNESTY).
18 posted on
07/12/2002 1:42:29 PM PDT by
healey22
To: KansasGirl; Arthur McGowan
If we get hit with a large attack by terrorists streaming into the country from Mexico since 9-11, I wouldn't be able to argue with Bush as the commander-in-chief being personally liable for gross negligence. Even though Congress could try to order the border secured by feds, Bush is the only one who can really secure it by ordering the military to do so.
It may be that that the Dems aren't making the border an issue either so they can pounce on him after the next attack. As an obvious forseeable risk since 9-11, a mass homicide due to the failure to even attempt to secure our borders (the FBI would never admit that though) would be very bad. Bush's sensitivity to Mexico is political, whereas his responsibility to all Americans is now military. Why do we need to sustain another attack to learn?
To: KansasGirl
"This may come back to bite Bush in the *ss." It has likely already cost him my vote.
22 posted on
07/12/2002 2:03:12 PM PDT by
blam
To: KansasGirl
This may come back to bite Bush in the *ss. This may/will come back to bite us Americans much more than in the @ss. Votes is not what concerns me at this point, it is our LIVES that are at stake here !
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson