[John Jorsett]

No one appointed you judge and jury of that cop's fate, sir, and it is not an endorsement of "police brutality," as you so primly and dishonestly put it, to insist that every piece of evidence, not simply the videotape you find so conclusive, be evaluated to determine whether the cop's actions were justified. And yeah, my "choice" of opinion is, you're anti-cop.

Who claimed I was his judge and jury? I've got eyes, a brain, and (probably to your horror) an opinion. And I don;t know where you got the idea that I don't want all the evidence examined. There may indeed be mitigating factors for some of what went on. The cop should be off the force in any case; the additional evidence, if any, will simply determine whether he should also be pursued civilly and/or criminally. That's my assessment and if it upsets you, tough.

[Map Kernow]

. The cop should be off the force in any case; the additional evidence, if any, will simply determine whether he should also be pursued civilly and/or criminally. That's my assessment and if it upsets you, tough.

He should be off the force in any case? Quite a snap judgment there, fellow. And nothing you could say or think could upset me---why should I let an ignorant proponent of kangaroo justice upset me? It just makes me thank God we still have a Constitution to thwart lynchers like you.