Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Who Taped Police Beating Arrested in L.A.
Reuters via Yahoo! News ^ | 07/11/02 | Dan Whitcomb

Posted on 07/11/2002 4:37:33 PM PDT by socal_parrot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-348 next last
To: socal_parrot
The dirty cops trying to scare the guy into covering their dirty Butts.
41 posted on 07/11/2002 5:37:19 PM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Would you mind citing what section of the California State Penal Code tasks the cops with "administration of justice?"

Silly me, I always thought it was the place of the courts to do that...

42 posted on 07/11/2002 5:37:19 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Your post #38, you have got to be kidding or you are an idiot, I suspect the later.
43 posted on 07/11/2002 5:40:06 PM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Question was didn't they just cap the rude little creep.

A whole bunch of problems would have been solved.

That was the only problem with Rodney King, they didn't cap him when they had the chance.

Their where several points in that little scenario where they would have been jiustified.

I haven't seen the tape, but from what I hear they would have probably been justified capping this dude prior to the tapping session.

44 posted on 07/11/2002 5:43:52 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
I hope he takes the city for all they got and will get, for the next 50 years, then they might learn how to manage police officers.
45 posted on 07/11/2002 5:44:31 PM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 1L
Athaletic hardcup.
46 posted on 07/11/2002 5:44:54 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
BTTT
47 posted on 07/11/2002 5:45:08 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Would you mind citing what section of the California State Penal Code tasks the cops with "administration of justice?"

The serving of a simple subpoena is an administration of justice

48 posted on 07/11/2002 5:45:17 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Uh, yeah. That wasn't a simple serving of a subpoena.
49 posted on 07/11/2002 5:48:01 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I heard that the kid wouldn't stand up....so the cop had to throw him up on the roof to make him stay up....
50 posted on 07/11/2002 5:48:32 PM PDT by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
He is nothing more than a media whore trying to use people like you that see abusive cops in your dreams and behind the next door.

I was expecting this. Criticize a cop, no matter how justified, and you're anti-police. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect police not to brutalize people. Knee-jerk defense of cops no matter what is far more damaging than wanting to see the bad ones off the force.

51 posted on 07/11/2002 5:52:16 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
That wasn't a simple serving of a subpoena.

I never said it was.....I characterized it as an administration of justice.

Going around in circles like this is making me dizzy

52 posted on 07/11/2002 5:53:22 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
The attorney should have kept his mouth shut--he's probably going to be fired for offering a really lame excuse (unless the cop is an even bigger meathead than the attorney is).

The cop's attorney? You think he made up the "excuse," as you call it? Careful, pal---you're transferring your feelings of hatred for cops to this lawyer the cop has hired.

53 posted on 07/11/2002 5:54:57 PM PDT by Map Kernow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
Your post #38, you have got to be kidding or you are an idiot, I suspect the later.

Let's see what develops of this, son, and we'll see who's the idiot. ;-)

54 posted on 07/11/2002 5:56:02 PM PDT by Map Kernow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Don't buy it.

He was cuffed. The donut muncher would have had to have been humping the perp like a dog for the perp to have been able to reach. (Perhaps the cop was, could be a dominance thing, cops are strange like that.)

Would'nt a prudent cop, at least, wear a jock strap when on duty? I know I would.

The guy with the camcorder is an object lesson to all the other camcorder owners out there. Don't point them at the cops unless you are squeeky clean.

55 posted on 07/11/2002 5:56:23 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
I haven't seen the tape, but from what I hear they would have probably been justified capping this dude prior to the tapping session.

Your post is DISGRACEFUL! Perhaps you should "watch the tape" before making any sort of comment, then to add insult to injury, you say that a retarded child should have been shot and killed. ( you are calling for the police to be Judge, Jury, and jackboots) I'm horrified by your post, to even speak of such things. Shame on you!!!

You , (to use your words) "probably" should view the evidence all of us are talking about, also "probably" should think before hitting the post button.

You get the respect you earn, from reading your post, its "0" at least from me.

56 posted on 07/11/2002 5:57:48 PM PDT by Japedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
The point the cops seem to have forgotten is that the film does not lie, no matter how they try to scare the guy that filmed it, their nuts really are in the vise.
57 posted on 07/11/2002 6:00:07 PM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Criticize a cop, no matter how justified, and you're anti-police. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect police not to brutalize people. Knee-jerk defense of cops no matter what is far more damaging than wanting to see the bad ones off the force.

I don't think it's decent to jump to conclusions about whether this cop was "brutalizing" someone. Kneejerk condemnation of cops no matter what is more the norm than "kneejerk defense" of them---thanks to 30+ years of politically correct media, education and politics. And yeah, I do think that's justly characterized as "anti-cop."

58 posted on 07/11/2002 6:01:27 PM PDT by Map Kernow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Sad thing is that this THIEF will be HANDSOMELY rewarded for his crime! Most likely in the MILLIONS of dollors! Hey, CRIME does pay after all!

If that happens, IMO, he'll be broke in two years or so after he gets duped into 'investing' in a rap group record company and a night club.

59 posted on 07/11/2002 6:02:14 PM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

TONIGHT (6pm pdt/9pm edt) on UNSPUN!

ANN COULTER and JESSE LEE PETERSON!

Click HERE and Listen LIVE while you FREEP!

ALSO! RadioFR's new CHAT SERVER IS UP! Come on in and CHAT!


60 posted on 07/11/2002 6:02:53 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson