Then we are at an impasse.
But it seems clear, you don't object to the theories of Darwin, except where those theories make predictions that contradict your faith.
So much so that you're left arguing that millions of little changes don't lead to a changed creature -- an obvious error that contradicts observed reality.
And that makes ya'lls position on Darwin and Evolution *very* contradictory.
YOU pick and choose selections from my posts to distort my responses, further your argument and subsequently sidestep any legitimate points I might make.
For the last time, if micro and macro are the same, show me the evidence. Give me examples from the fossil record of transitional species. Show me evidence of anything currently undergoing change on a species level.
You used the phrase "observed reality." Again for the last time, WHAT observed reality? Point it out already. Stop sidestepping and give me one example. Just one.