Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blowtorch
Darwin observed natural selection, like we all do. He didn't observe evolution, and neither does anyone else, because things don't evolve.

This is the specific mechanism of your denial -- to 'rename' adaption.

The changes that occur in species due to natural selection is called 'evolution'. You don't like the word, for reasons you're not entirely sure of, so you play with the words until you've gotten rid of the threatening word 'evolution'. You agree with the specifics of the theory, but don't like one specific application of the theory, so try and discredit the entire theory.

But you can't ignore the truth. Adaption changes the species fundamentally. And enough small changes to a thing, and you will have a fundamentally different thing.

You say you don't believe in 'evolution', but do believe in natural selection.

What an amazing self-contradiction.

884 posted on 07/16/2002 1:02:56 PM PDT by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies ]


To: Dominic Harr
DNA is like a computer program. There are variables that you can plug into the program but they are still under the constraints of the program.

If you use MS Windows long enough, even after all the crashes, and fatal errors, it will not become UNIX.

887 posted on 07/16/2002 1:13:43 PM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic Harr
I'm still waiting for your example of evolution. A semi-morphed creature, or an example of adding beneficial genetic material. Until you find me that, we are talking about two different things. You are saying 1+1=4. Fuzzy math. And because you don't see the difference between natural selection and evolution, you call everybody an evolutionist. I'm still waiting for your "evidence," of evolution. We all are.
888 posted on 07/16/2002 1:13:46 PM PDT by Blowtorch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic Harr
The changes that occur in species due to natural selection is called 'evolution'.

No, no, no. Evolution is about the descent of one species from a simpler, less complex species. In fact Darwin for a long time did not even use evolution to describe his theory he called a theory of descent. In fact, adaptation is in a way a contradiction of the whole evolutionist ethos. If a species can adapt to its environment without transforming itself into another species - what need, what necessity is there for it to go through the long, dangerous, indeterminate process necessary for it to evolve as evolutionists claim it happens. The answer is that there is no need at all.

948 posted on 07/16/2002 7:56:37 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson