Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
I ignore slimers, sore losers, and people who have nothing to add to the discussion but insults.

I must presume this includes me due to my inclusion in the address list. If this is the case, however, why did you bother objecting to post 1,211 on this thread in which I parodied your style? It appears that your post is merely a convenient way for you to evade answering everyone who disagrees with you. Somehow we all seem to fall into the above definition.

Even that might not be terribly objectionable, except that you repeatedly and consistently fail to meet your own standards. In fact, the entire list above is exactly descriptive of your own behavior ... and we can also add the word, "hypocrite."

I've got a little list:

1. You've lied about other posters. If you had simply made a mistake ... which all of us have done ... and then acknowledged it, this could be overlooked. But you never acknowledge mistakes and you never apologize. And you wonder why others are antagonized by you.
2. You're refused to admit your mistakes when they're pointed out. In addition to the lying, this pertains to astonishing errors in reading comprehension, plane geometry, simple arithmetic, astronomy, and mathematics. Again, you never give an inch, even when the errors are so blisteringly obvious, an "oops" would have covered it. {You did acknowledge one typo once. We were all encouraged, but alas, our hopes were dashed when the acknowledgement turned out to be an aberration].
3. You've ignored questions posted to you when you find them uncomfortable to answer.
4. You've presented utterly unsupportable assertions as fact, but refused to acknowledge either the unsupportable nature of the assertions, or the fact that you'd done it.

Your behavior has been so childish, in fact, that you've made it impossible to respond to you in a rational fashion. Congratulations. You must be proud.

854 posted on 07/16/2002 7:52:15 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 841 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial/technological progress(no evolution--zero)...moral/social character-values(private/personal) INTELLECTUAL GROWTH!
863 posted on 07/16/2002 10:30:40 AM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson