Replies

Poor Drumbo,

I will not attack your faith anymore, it seems I have you a bit on edge.

Science looks at natural occurances that can be proven and builds upon it. NO faith is necessary, just the facts are taken into consideration. You on the other hand have a book, which you obviously have taken on faith, without any study or scrutiny whatsoever and have chosen it to lead your life by. That's fine, you believe I am wrong, I on the other hand know that I am right. Pretty simple to me.

Study the history of your holy book and come and talk to me then. You obviously do NOT know what I am talking about, because you repeated my questions back at me. LOOK at the history, not at the book itself. I even studied the history, what there was of it, of the book of Mormon, laughable to say the least, but I studied it, what about scientology, most people don't know that L Ron Hubbard started that religion on a bet. Sounds like a good reason to me, again, laughable.

I will bet on science EVERY time, it comes up with an answer, it does not say, I believe this, it says, it looks like these facts fit into this theory, and this fact seems to fit into it as well, hmmm, facts seem to fit, we'll keep this until more facts come along to disprove it.

You have no facts to disprove evolution, you have faith in something that was written thousands of years ago, and then tossed together by man less then 1600 years ago, and they called it holy. Oh yeah, sounds like it's credible to me.

Thanks for playing though, come back when you have a clue.

I don't mind if you want to believe the bible, I have no trouble with it at all, my trouble is when you try to disprove scientific facts and theories with myth and superstition. Religion and science cannot and do not mix. it does not mean that a scientist cannot be religious, it just means that he has to leave it at home, or perhaps be OPEN minded enough to look at things in a different light, unlike you of course who wishes to force your religious beliefs down my throat. Religion belongs in Philosophy class, science belongs in a science class. Evolution and ID has no place in a science class, just as science does not have a place in a philosophy class. Science is science, religion is religion, they do not mix when it comes to facts. Because religion is not based on facts, it is based on faith, keep your faith in your religion, I will base my facts on science.

I cannot prove a negative, nor can you. Therefore, you have no facts to disprove God either. You cannot even back up any of your attacks or ignorant statements about Him. Your faith in science does not prove your questionable theories, and you have cited nothing to back up your fossil fantasies. You admitted that your "facts" change at will, you ignored coherient questions about your red herrings and you responded with circular reasoning and ad homonyms. You may delude yourself and that you have won a great victory for father Darwin in the name of science, but in reality you not only loose but you are an embarrassment to the evolutionist camp which abandoned you some time ago.