Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
Get real, all this proof you have is not proof but propaganda from creationists. Oh, and let's not forget ID'rs too, they love to try and disprove evolution, but facts are facts there Gore, sorry.

There is NO proof that disproves evolution, you may like to think so, but NO REAL scientist in his right mind, who has the facts at his disposal, would say what you are saying. Evolution is far from being disproved, it is growing in proof EVERY day, whether you like to admit it or not.

Every day, some archeaologist or paleontologist finds more facts, and those facts seem to just fit right into the theory of evolution, puts more of the puzzle together, seems to make it tighter and tighter, EVERY day.... You poor delusional human being, what is wrong with being a cousin of the Chimpanzee? we share 98% of our Genome with them, 98% of our DNA matches, and you think that we are NOT related? COME on, give me a break.....
720 posted on 07/13/2002 9:23:38 PM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000
There is NO proof that disproves evolution, you may like to think so,

Of course there is and I gave you two - platypus and euglena. But there are many more proofs against evolution:
1. Evolutionists cannot show a single species that has been transformed into another species.
2. Evolutionists cannot show a single mutation which has been beneficial to the organism.
3. Evolutionists cannot show how a single new gene can be created.
4. Evolutionists cannot show how you can change the developmental program of an organism by random means.
5. Evolutionists cannot show how the bat developed a sonar system better than what our armed forces have through gradual evolution.

There are many more questions that cannot be answered by evolutionists, but those will keep evolutionists busy for quite a while as it is.

There is another problem with evolution, and while they say the theory of evolution does not encompass abiogenesis, it certainly depends on it and here's why: if life was created by God as the complete impossibility of abiogenesis certainly implies, then there is no reason to assume that God has not had a hand in the creation of species.

As to paleontological proofs of evolution, they do not prove anything except the dishonesty of the whole profession. The numerous fakes which were perpetrated by paleontologists because they needed a 'link' show that. The many absolutely outrageous claims by paleontologists such as that a pair of teeth 10,000 miles away prove the descent of a toothless animal (the platypus), that a pair of ankle bones and a jaw found a thousand miles away a decade before constitute proof of the first primate, that another jaw and a pasted up partial skull is proof of the first mammal, that Lucy, whose face was more plaster than bone, was the first human, etc., etc., etc.

You poor delusional human being, what is wrong with being a cousin of the Chimpanzee? we share 98% of our Genome with them, 98% of our DNA matches, and you think that we are NOT related?

This is another of the false statements made by evolution. Similarities between species are not proof of evolution. No intelligent being would reinvent the wheel every time he needs one. The similarities are just as well proof of intelligent design. And BTW - DNA analysis has shown that man in no way descended from any kind of apes.

731 posted on 07/14/2002 10:09:29 AM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson