Sounds like all the experts on evolution needed you as an advisor back there. Basically, they set out to prove evolution by producing it experimentally. You suspect the problem might be that evolutionists are just too stupid to conduct experiments properly?
No, I suspect that you are so upset at Mr. Darwin for entirely mistaken reasons, and you deliberately misrepresent the findings of that research to try and deal with the cognitive dissonance.
You clearly dispise Mr. Darwin, yet you agree with him and his theory.
And to deal with that dichotomy, I think you mistakenly argue against the wrong thing.
The proof is in the idea, "I believe that species evolve to adapt to their surroundings, but I do *not* believe in Darwinism."
That is a logical contradiction.