[medved]

The hell of it is that this was known in Chuck Darwin's time. Chuck went to the animal breeders for opinions on his BS theory before he published it and they all told him he was FUBAR. They told him you could breed a dog into a chuhuahua or a great dane, but that was every bit of it. You could not breed a dog into a pig, a goat, a bird, or anything else which wasn't a dog and, moreover, you could turn a whole dog pound into the wild and in five generations, all which would be left alive would be your universal 40 - 50-lb. wild dog again.

For the lowdown on Chuck Darwin, stupidest white man of all time and his BS theory, and on the continuing efforts of feebs like Steve Gould and Niles Eldredge to keep the charade going for another generation:

[Dominic Harr]

For the lowdown on Chuck Darwin, stupidest white man of all time and his BS theory,

This kind of talk, specifically, is what has attracted me to this debate.

You do believe species evolve to adapt to their changing environment. You agree with Darwin.

Yet you disparage him and his theory.

I do not think you're saying what you mean to say. Your disagreement is not with Darwin. You *agree* with Darwin.

You seem to be contradicting yourself.

[Right Wing Professor]

For the lowdown on Chuck Darwin, stupidest white man of all time and his BS theory, and on the continuing efforts of feebs like Steve Gould and Niles Eldredge to keep the charade going for another generation:

Read the above erudite prose, and then read this:

http://www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-origin-of-species/chapter-01.html

Now which sample of prose evinces the more intellligence? Does anyone really think Darwin's writing is consistent with his being the stupidest white man of all time? Heck, I don't even think medved is the stupidest white man of all time!