Look, I'm no scientist but I somehow got this crazy idea that there is a much greater difference between micro and macroevolution than simply time, with macro involving changes on the SPECIES level and micro involving changes within species. Please explain to me how time of any length could change one species to another, and evidence for me when and where we know that actually happened. THAT'S what many creationists have a problem with, NOT the age of the earth. There are plenty of creationists who accept the earth being billions rather than thousands of years old.
Please explain to me how time of any length could change one species to another, and evidence for me when and where we know that actually happened. A bunch of little changes always add up to big changes.
It's only a matter of time.
If you change 1% of a species every million years, then in a hundred million years you'll have changed 100% of the species. You'd have an entirely different species.
You're no longer talking about the same species.
The only difference between 'macro' and 'micro' is the time involved.
Consider -- if the Earth is indeed 4+ billion years old, then you would have had millions and millions of changes over billions and billions of years.
Your argument is not with the Darwinists. You believe in evolution.