Let me get this straight. If a guy takes pictures from the sears catalogue and puts them on a website and charges for access, he is selling the kids, yet Sears is not exploiting kies (nor the parents apparently).
And these sites, which are purported to be created to gain popularity and entrance into the child modeling arena, are to be considered child porn even though it isn't any normal person who would view the pictures and think of having sex with a child.
We aren't talking about normal people. We are talking about pedophiles.