To: AppyPappy
So you think child actors are sexually exploited and underwear ads are the same as pedophilia? You're redefining your terms now. You said any exploitation. Furthermore, by your own definition, underwear ads are sexual exploitation since you consider these teen model sites sexual exploitation.
86 posted on
07/12/2002 8:35:59 AM PDT by
Demidog
To: Demidog
Underwear ads ARE sexual exploitation if they are sold as such. If a guy goes out and takes hundreds of pictures of kids in underwear so he can sell the pictures on his website, that's sexual exploitation. He's not selling the underwear, he's selling the kids.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson