[Demidog]

I haven't misquoted you. I wasn't even directing it at you personally. But if I was, perhaps you'd know how the families feel whom you've decided should be investigated by some authoritarian agency simply because you think they're out of line.

If, as you've now admitted, only pedophiles will be aroused by these sites, then what in the world is any legislation going to prevent or remedy?

[GreenEggsHam]

I haven't misquoted you. I wasn't even directing it at you personally. But if I was, perhaps you'd know how the families feel whom you've decided should be investigated by some authoritarian agency simply because you think they're out of line.
If, as you've now admitted, only pedophiles will be aroused by these sites, then what in the world is any legislation going to prevent or remedy?
+++++
Ok, then to whom "in this thread" were you directing your comment? I think you're doing a little dodging here. If you'll read the entire thread instead of jumping on one post in a *discussion* you'll see that I'm not in favor of the legislation advocated by the original article. That doesn't mean that I like the sexploitation of the children, though.

[GreenEggsHam]

Further, investigation in and of itself isn't necessarily a bad thing. If more families who are abusing children were reported...blah blah blah. if there's no abuse going on, nothing further needs to be done. I believe it's everybody's responsibility to protect children from abuse. If you're so govophobic that you're willing to sacrifice the lives of children so that you don't feel like the big bad man is gonna come knocking on your door...eh, nevermind. (but I bet you wouldn't mind getting to "decide" who the FBI/CIA investigate right about now, would you?)