Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
You were adding editorial content. You were assuming "fully clothed" when you meant "had on some form of clothing". My child cannot go to school in a bikini because she is not "fully clothed" in my eyes.
60 posted on 07/11/2002 12:21:10 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
You were adding editorial content. You were assuming "fully clothed" when you meant "had on some form of clothing". My child cannot go to school in a bikini because she is not "fully clothed" in my eyes.

But certainly she is able to go to the public swimming pool? Or are you unwilling to let her go there, on the chance a pedophile might get a charge by looking at her?

But your point about "fully clothed" is well-taken. Please amend my quote to say lawmakers [will] attempt to craft legislation to clamp down on Internet sites featuring [decently clothed] preteen and teen 'models'"

61 posted on 07/11/2002 12:28:47 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson