I believe in your right to your own opinion.
IF you want to debate DW's guilt, and tell me how wrong I may be, you need to provide something better.
All night long, and yesterday also, you set the same pattern. Others have mentioned it also. You won't answer questions, provide proof, backup what you say.
Any answers you do give are just more speculation and opinion on your part.
You and redlipstick were saying you/she had READ the released affidavits and they were VERY INTERESTING. One of you is a LIAR. Plain and simple. You stated you have posted reference to a press release and now you back down.
What I am saying is this.
(1) I don't dislike you. You are , I am sure, a very nice person. We all are (those who aren't , raise your hand)
(2) Just because we are on different sides, so what. That is the fun of it.
(3) this is the problem. You have no credibility. Period. When you won't answer, or refuse to back up what you say.
Maybe you have your reasons, just like I am getting off the computer here in about 10 minutes, so if TIME is the consideration , fine. But this has been going on for at least two days, so it would take a little more than, gotta go right now.
You have debated fairly well, I give you credit, and stuck in there. I like that. But, just like us, you have to back up things with proof, if you want anyone else to listen.
If I don't hear from you again until the trial starts, (I won't be on the computer until Monday) Have a nice weekend, or several (10 days, I believe).
Are you kidding? I back up what I say. And the article you want me to look up for you I already posted on the threads around the time of the dog handler's testimony.