I realize the interview with the Det. Redden was redacted (They told us that, and it abruptly ends)--which means we don't know that he was cut off from talking about the woman, just that the judge may have determined the jury was not to hear it. There are lots of things a judge won't allow into a trial based on relevancy, prejudice, etc. But you can bet if he gave a plausible explanation as to how, when or why Danielle got in the MH it would not have been excluded.
You mean, like the bug guy, who said that the body was not dumped after the 16th, because of only one generation of fly larvae, and wasn't dumped much before the 16th because of the lack of beetle larvae?
But you can bet if he gave a plausible explanation as to how, when or why Danielle got in the MH it would not have been excluded.
Right, which is what happened. Testimony was given by the neighbors to show that the MH was often parked outside for several days before camping trips, and it was, on at least one occasion, left unlocked.
Would you bet the rest of your life on it?