[agarrett]

If she were alive in the motor home, the dog would have alerted inside the motor home. Your assumption is not valid.

  That's good. I'd missed that.

  OK, it's obvious that the prosecution is claiming Danielle was in the motor home, right? I mean, that is what all the fiber and hair stuff is about. So why do they say the dog didn't alert? Or don't they mention it at all?

  I remember the bit about the corpse-sniffing dog being debunked - but did the defense make anything of dogs not alerting inside?

Drew Garrett

[John Jamieson]

Feldman's got a lot of ground to cover in his closing arguments (if this case gets that far!). I'll bet he doesn't miss a beat. Hope they give him a enough time.