I admit, during the first bit of 180-Frank's testimony about cadaver dog Cielo's "hit" on the MH storage facility, I leaped off the fence and thought, "Well, that's it then. You can trust a cadaver dog to not be politically motivated. DAW must be guilty." And then, only moments later, 180-Frank's testimony disintigrated before our very eyes.
If any evidence at all, ANY solid proof, not just innuendo and circumstantial microscopic fiber similarities, showed that DAW were involved in any way, I would suspect him with great prejudice. But there has been nothing, despite Dusek's proclamation that "all the evidence in this case and all the interviews point directly at the defendent," to implicate DAW in this poor girl's death.
There has been plenty, however, that appears to exonerate him. It's just that way too many folks are unwilling to even consider, much less believe, the testimony of the experts, friends, acquaintances, campers, other eyewitnesses, and neighbors who say something that might clear DAW. I pray that the jury is composed of twelve individuals who have a real sense of duty, honor, and integrity, who want the TRUTH and can see through the lies and deceit.
If DAW were guilty, I would want him to pay with his life. But IMHO, based on all the evidence presented, I believe he is NOT GUILTY. In my opinion, he is merely a convenient patsy for the real killer.
I'm off the fence. FREE NINJA DAVE!