Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Karson
I was watching -- way back -- when Feldman brought up the Feb 16 phone call to Brenda on crossexam. She looked like she was about to faint but of course Mudd sustained the objection and she didn't have to answer. She still looked rattled tho. I wish I had a clip of that.

For the uninitiated, can someone please give a theory as to what the February 16 phone call might be (and why the prosecution would be so afraid of it)?

338 posted on 07/11/2002 12:56:41 PM PDT by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]


To: winstonchurchill
This is Feldman on cross exam with BVD:

1 Q. DO YOU RECALL AT SOME POINT IN TIME, AT LEAST

2 UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE HAD BEEN SOME FORM OF EITHER PHONE

3 TRAP, PHONE TRACE OR PHONE TAPS ON YOUR TELEPHONES?

4 A. NO.

5 Q. DIRECTING YOUR ATTENTION TO APPROXIMATELY THE 16TH

6 OF FEBRUARY 2002, DO YOU RECALL GETTING A TELEPHONE CALL, A

7 MESSAGE CONCERNING YOUR DAUGHTER?

8 MR. DUSEK: OBJECTION, HEARSAY, BEYOND THE SCOPE, THIRD

9 PARTY.

10 THE COURT: COUNSEL, I'LL HEAR YOU AT SIDEBAR.

We never heard anymore about the phone call but yesterday's testimony indicates Danielle's body was probably placed at the discovery site on or around the same date as this phone call.

343 posted on 07/11/2002 1:07:49 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson