[Southflanknorthpawsis]

If you lend credence to the scientific evidence, it needs to apply to all scientific evidence.

I realize that the VDAs are bending over backwards to spin David Faulkner's testimony, but he made it clear that the bugs tell a different story......the time of death is VERY likely later than February 5th.

Never forget that Faulkner was brought in by the Prosecution. That speaks volumes. If your interpretation is correct, why didn't Dusek bring Faulkner as HIS witness?

[cyncooper]

If you lend credence to the scientific evidence, it needs to apply to all scientific evidence.

I realize that the VDAs are bending over backwards to spin David Faulkner's testimony, but he made it clear that the bugs tell a different story......the

If one takes all of Faulkner's testimony in total, combined with all of the other evidence presented, no "spin" is necessary to hold an opinion such as I hold. (And I am not saying the opposite conclusion cannot be held honorably)

And I don't lend credence to arguments that are buttressed with personal attacks such as calling one a "VDA" or telling someone they are not ethical enough to be a good juror.