Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pyx; spectre; FresnoDA; Politicalmom
About that phone call Feldman was asking about today--KitKat on Jams' remembered this portion of the trial testimony:

19 Q. DID THEY ASK TO PUT A TAP ON YOUR PHONE, TRACE YOUR

20 PHONE CALLS?

21 A. NOT THAT I RECALL.

------------------------LATER

3852
1 Q. DO YOU RECALL AT SOME POINT IN TIME, AT LEAST

2 UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE HAD BEEN SOME FORM OF EITHER PHONE

3 TRAP, PHONE TRACE OR PHONE TAPS ON YOUR TELEPHONES?

4 A. NO.

5 Q. DIRECTING YOUR ATTENTION TO APPROXIMATELY THE 16TH

6 OF FEBRUARY 2002, DO YOU RECALL GETTING A TELEPHONE CALL, A

7 MESSAGE CONCERNING YOUR DAUGHTER?

8 MR. DUSEK: OBJECTION, HEARSAY, BEYOND THE SCOPE, THIRD

9 PARTY.

10 THE COURT: COUNSEL, I'LL HEAR YOU AT SIDEBAR.

11

12

13 (PROCEEDINGS NOT PART OF PUBLIC RECORD.)
=============


(6-6, morning pt. 2)

Ok, folks, now what do you think this might have been about?


148 posted on 07/11/2002 9:36:19 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
Miz - I didn't quite catch what all that stuff was about - was Feldman implying that he does not have access to that (the phone tap) but knows it exists? I did catch that there were some documents - warrants? - that would be released at noon - 5 maybe - but that a 6th was still up in the air somehow? What did you make of all that?
152 posted on 07/11/2002 9:40:48 AM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
I think someone called and said they had kidnapped the little girl and the police caught the call on a phone tap. Defense wanted to use the call to point the finger at someone else. But the call falls within hearsay and did not fall with an exception.
159 posted on 07/11/2002 9:43:57 AM PDT by GoldenBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
About that phone call Feldman was asking about today

What do I think about this ? I'd speculate that the phone call received on February 16, 2002 objected to on two occassions by Dusek is as exculpatory for David Alan Westerfield as the insect testimony by Faulkner and that the DA and prosecution would very much like such evidence surpressed -- irrespective of the Supreme Court ruling that ALL evidence, including exculpatory evidence be made available to the defence. I believe the phone call detailed where Danielle Van Dam's body was. I'd also note that search groups had previously searched the same Dehesa Rd area and that Damon Van Dam had left on his second mystery blue van adventure AGAINST the advice of police on that same date.
225 posted on 07/11/2002 10:56:18 AM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson