[Henrietta]

I believe the judge will give instructions and it will be interesting.

Well, he can't instruct them to disregard the evidence.

My position is that the MH being parked near her house does not account for the forensic evidence within it.

And my position is that if he did what the prosecution claims he did in that MH, there would be a lot more than a few fibers, one drop of blood, one hair, and one partial handprint. Murder and disposing of bodies usually leaves more stuff around, and leaves some scents around, which is lacking in this case.

[hoosiermama]

I agree not enough blood, hair etc. for her to be killed in the MH! One hair in drain, one small dot of blood from a child with frequent nosebleeds, a finger print or two in an unlocked MH, occasionally parked near the park where the child played, does not PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt.

Question, if the warrents used to investigate DW were obtained using false information from the impeached BVD, would the evidence gathered be thrown out of court?