Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W's 'scandal'
TownHall.com ^ | 7/11/02 | Robert Novak

Posted on 07/10/2002 9:07:06 PM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON -- The dominant subject at President Bush's rare press conference Monday evening was not new corporate scandals that threaten America's capitalist economy. It was a 12-year-old stock sale by private citizen George W. Bush. That caused a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) official, who long ago gave Bush a clean bill of health, to ponder the wondrous ways of Washington.

That official was not, as National Public Radio suggested Tuesday morning, then Republican SEC Chairman Richard Breeden (appointed by the elder President George Bush). It was SEC enforcement chief William McLucas, now a partner in one of Washington's most prestigious law firms -- and a Democrat. He recently produced the report that revealed the Enron scandal. McLucas told me, "I can see no reason" to replay his 1990 Bush inquiry.

The reason, of course, is partisan politics. Corporate frauds stretching from Enron to WorldCom, which have destroyed investor confidence and undermine the economy, do threaten a political opening against the Republicans and Bush. Nevertheless, Democrats could not resist trying to exploit the president's personal conduct by resurrecting an obscure stock transaction.

On CBS's "Face the Nation" Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle called Bush's handling of his stock transaction "illustrative of the permissive environment: and this attitude about business that is very destructive and very disconcerting to many of us." The news media ate it up, peppering Bush with no fewer than nine questions in Monday's news conference.

Actually, the story is straightforward -- lacking the mysterious twists of Whitewater. In 1990, Bush was out of the oil business and raising money to buy a share of the Texas Rangers baseball team. A board member of Harken Energy Corp., Bush sold $848,000 of the company's stock two months before the company reported millions of dollars in losses, which sharply dropped its stock price after the sale.

Was this insider trading? That's what the SEC set out to investigate a dozen years ago (probably triggered by media accounts, according to McLucas's recollection). As a Republican appointee, Breeden wanted no personal part of this and instructed McLucas to charge ahead without fear or favor. McLucas does not remember talking to Breeden, but was well aware that they were investigating the president's son.

That made no difference at the SEC, which had not been impeded in the investigation of President Jimmy Carter's good friend Bert Lance and other well-connected targets. A compelling fact was that the Harken stock actually was selling for more at the time of investigation than it was when Bush sold it. That's hardly a good case for insider trading, particularly when no "material non-public information" by Bush was found. The case was closed. The final sentence in the SEC's order saying that Bush was not "exonerated" was legalistic "boilerplate" and meaningless, said McLucas.

The major new accusation against Bush has been that he was eight months late filing a confirming report of the stock sale, though he earlier had alerted the SEC as required by law. The tardy report was in McLucas's hand when he ruled. "If you went to court against every late filing with us," McLucas told me, "we would be in court on 2,000 cases."

Whatever Willie McLucas says is credible. After more than 21 years at the SEC, he joined the big-time Washington firm of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering. He was secured by Enron as chief investigator in the internal inquiry that brought down the energy firm's house of cards. Now, with the disclosure of hiding $3.9 billion, WorldCom has signed McLucas to conduct an independent investigation.

When Bush the elder was running for re-election as president in 1992, the venerable Democratic Rep. John Dingell requested a SEC briefing about the stock sale but did not hit sufficient pay dirt to go public. Texas Gov. Ann Richards, desperate in resisting the junior Bush's challenge in 1994, raised the issue -- to no avail. The case came up briefly when Bush ran for re-election for governor in 1998 and for president in 2000.

Despite these failures, Democratic National Chairman Terry McAuliffe could not resist attacking Bush's personal conduct as payback for the treatment of his patron, Bill Clinton. The irony is that serious threats to the economy offer incomparably richer opportunities for the Democratic opposition.

Contact Robert Novak | Read his biography

©2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/10/2002 9:07:06 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
When does McAuliffe, explain his rags to riches investment in Global Crossing.Com? Now there is a fairy tale unsurpassed since Hillary ran ten thousand dollars into one hundred thousand bucks,in an area that often poverterizes second and third generation speculators.

Can't the liberals get it through their skulls, that even though many of us are just as dumb as they think we are, none of us are stupid?

2 posted on 07/10/2002 9:28:43 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Can't the liberals get it through their skulls, that even though many of us are just as dumb as they think we are, none of us are stupid?

The closing of the "digital divide" and Fox news are throwing a monkey wrench into the democrats playbook. Nobody trusts the broadcast media anymore.

3 posted on 07/10/2002 9:33:30 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
ten thousand dollars

just for the record, her only deposit into the account was ONE thousand dollars

the stupid witch should be a little more careful about opening her whining, lying yap about any trading issues, insider or otherwise, or one of these days someone might resurrect her not very well disguised receipt of a bribe

4 posted on 07/10/2002 11:07:44 PM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Please see also:

Trust Busters

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

5 posted on 07/11/2002 4:10:02 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I don't gusss Larry Klayman is going to file a suit on this? I don't understand why not-- filing suit when "there is no 'there'" is his speciality.
6 posted on 07/11/2002 7:01:41 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
That would be an occasion worth celebrating.
7 posted on 07/11/2002 9:44:09 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
bump!
8 posted on 07/11/2002 9:46:35 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Nobody trusts the broadcast media anymore.

That's what I'm hearing, too. Everyone I talk to is saying how they can't beleive more than half of the nightly news.

9 posted on 07/11/2002 9:51:22 AM PDT by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
When does McAuliffe, explain his rags to riches investment in Global Crossing.Com?

Never. He's already been confronted with it (by Tim Russert, of all people, for one) and he just brazens it out... "Are you against capitalism or something?" The brain-dead media just roll over for him.

As a further example of this being a DNC-media co-production tempest-in-a-teapot, compare "reporter" reactions to the Daschle-Gephardt BS fest last Tuesday, in which a docile media let them drone on for 30 minutes without a single challenging question, versus the Bush press conference, in which Dubya repeatedly answered the same Harken stock trade question at least 4 times. The beltway media are nothing but DNC operatives.

10 posted on 07/11/2002 9:51:36 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Bump
11 posted on 07/11/2002 10:06:00 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
"The beltway media are nothing but DNC operatives."

So true. Without the media abetting their deciet, the Democrat's party would cease to exist.

12 posted on 07/11/2002 8:40:52 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson