"In very brief cross-examinations of Peer and other forensic experts who testified Thursday, defense lawyer Steven Feldman appeared to concede the blood was Danielle’s. He focused on what the experts did not know — the circumstances under which the blood spilled"
Guess Feldman doesn't know about the "mit" thing. Maybe you can contact him before it's too late.
They know about it...You want to ignore all the other things..Why don't you look to what WASN'T there? That is the whole point of this discussion. You can't explain the absense of things that should have been at the crime scene, now can you?
I'll wait for the "big finish" when Dusek's explains to us, (as promised) just how Westerfield was able to pull this crime off and how he actually accomplished the "almost perfect crime"...NOT!
So again, what's WEIRD about Westerfield?
sw