Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pyx
No I've thought Westerfield did it for awhile now. Bill's comments tonight just show that some people see through the BS pushed by the Feldman's, Cochrans, Bailey's, Scheck's etc etc.
646 posted on 07/11/2002 12:10:14 AM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies ]


To: Greg Weston
You seem to think Darlie Routier is innocent despite the blood evidence found on her nightgown after allegedly stabbing to death her two sons.

Why does Westerfield get your guilty vote?

653 posted on 07/11/2002 12:17:45 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: Greg Weston
No I've thought Westerfield did it for awhile now. Bill's comments tonight just show that some people see through the BS pushed by the Feldman's, Cochrans, Bailey's, Scheck's etc etc.

Oh puleeeze !
Any moron can parrot what Bill O'Reilly's teleprompter writers put in front of him.

Read the TESTIMONY given by Faulkner a forensic entimologist today and buy yourself a clue.
655 posted on 07/11/2002 12:23:39 AM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: Greg Weston
"Bill's comments tonight just show that some people see through the BS pushed by the Feldman's, Cochrans, Bailey's, Scheck's etc etc."

No, O'Reilly's comments just show his ignorance of the facts. I doubt if he's watched more than five minutes of the trial, and I seriously doubt if he's ever even glanced at the transcripts of the trial or the PH. And your comments show that you'd rather take some ignorant (of this case, anyway) television talking head as gospel instead of looking at the information for yourself. It's the same sort of laziness that gave us Bill Clinton for 8 long years--no one wants to do the work to find out just what the truth is. It's just too easy to swallow the prepared media pablum.

Now, it's also possible to read the transcripts and still come away thinking DW is guilty--but that's an honest disagreement, as opposed to quoting nonsense that's been debunked in the trial as you have been doing.

Cleaning spree my as...terisk. Sheesh!

720 posted on 07/11/2002 6:22:01 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: Greg Weston
As opposed to the B/S pushed by Dusek? Well, they have unidentified prints and DNA in Danielle's bedroom and prints at points of entry/exit. All kinds of other fiber that Dusek didn't bother with. The RV was never fully dusted for prints and there are unidentified prints from there as well because they didn't belong to Danielle.

The original question was who's B/S? And what sideshow?

**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**

733 posted on 07/11/2002 7:06:09 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson