Replies

It's been my opinion for a few weeks now that the prosecution knows DAW did not commit this crime. I also believe that LE knows this too. They were led into this by the VD's. Whereas most think Dusek is blowing this, I think they are laying the groundwork for the inevitable indictment of Damon. Get it all out now in discovery. Give enough to make sure the jury can't possibly find him guilty. If they jump on Damon now, he lawyers up and we have another John and Patsy Ramsey on their hands. Let Damon and Brenda stew awhile longer. They are displaying the classic signs, i.e. the big purchases, of a couple who know they have very little freedom left.

Your observations seem astute and well stated.
My position is I truly hope the Van Dams had nothing (more than irresponsibility) to do with Danielle's death. I truly want to believe its someone else entirely and the Van Dams are simply displaying the machinations of white trash liberals constantly tailspinning into the ground.

It may very well end up that I am the wishful thinker in this and be completely wrong about Damon. I just can't conceptualize a father hurting his child like that. There's something about it that refuses to click and allow such a thing to even be considered. I know that incest must exist somewhere, but the sheer horror of even thinking about it, makes it unacceptable for me to even want to contemplate. And so, as naive as it may seem, I reject it for now.

There appear to be many convinced Damon is the one. And while I completely agree with others that Damon's behavior is deplorable ... scratch that ... he is a completely despicable person, I recognize that we all grieve in different ways and wonder if this might mitigate his actions. Its just that I need tangible evidence to jump off the fence about Damon. In short, I'll presume Damon is innocent in this regard until there is reasonable doubt to convince me otherwise.

Now if all y'all can present this pharmboy with some tangible evidence, I'm more than willing to reconsider.