[mommya]

I think the Defense closing arument needs to be honest - "Ladies and gentlemen - we cannot tell you exaxtly how little Danielle's blood and fingerprints got into the MH - we just do not know that answer - what we can tell you though - without hesitation - definitively - is that those things did not come to be there because of anything DW did to Danielle in there. He did not kidnap her - he did not kill her - and to Mr W's knowledge - Little Danielle has not been in his MH."...you get the drift.

[Freedom2specul8]

Yes, that's a fair enough defense closing..I'm sure they'll point out the unlocked doors too, This has left me with more questions than answers. Ihave to take a break...so will talk to you later..

[cynwoody]

I think the Defense closing arument needs to be honest - "Ladies and gentlemen - we cannot tell you exaxtly how little Danielle's blood and fingerprints got into the MH ...

If the entomological argument holds up, the most plausible conclusion is that DW didn't do it and was most likely framed by the real murderer. The state's physical evidence could then be dismissed as part of the frameup effort. Reasonable doubt, don't you know!

Next question: Which two-legged maggot is the real murderer?